Developmental changes in shortening of pro-saccade reaction time while maintaining neck flexion position
- PMID: 29321065
- PMCID: PMC5763661
- DOI: 10.1186/s40101-017-0161-7
Developmental changes in shortening of pro-saccade reaction time while maintaining neck flexion position
Abstract
Background: We investigated developmental changes in shortening of pro-saccade reaction time while maintaining neck flexion.
Methods: Subjects comprised 135 children (3-14 years) and 29 young adults (19-23 years). Children were divided into six groups in 2-year age strata. Pro-saccade reaction tasks for 30 s were performed in neck rest and flexion positions. Reaction times under each position were averaged in every 10-s period.
Results: Under neck rest position, reaction time in the 0-10 s period was significantly longer in the 3- to 4-year-old group than in the 5- to 6-year-old group and above. No significant age effect was found for reaction time in the 0-10 s period in the 5- to 6-year-old group and above. Although a significant effect of neck flexion was not observed until the 9- to 10-year-old group, significant shortening of reaction time with neck flexion was found in the 11- to 12-year-old group and above. Furthermore, this shortening was maintained until the first 20-s period in the 11- to 12-year-old group and during the entire 30 s in the 13- to 14-year-old and above.
Conclusions: These results suggest that brain activation with the maintenance of neck flexion, related to shortening of the pro-saccade reaction time, was found from a later age of approximately 11 years and above, compared with the age at which information-processing function in the pro-saccade was enhanced. In addition, brain activation with the maintenance of neck flexion was sustained longer with age.
Keywords: Brain activation; Development; Neck flexion; Pro-saccade reaction time.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, all subjects provided informed consent after receiving an explanation of the experimental protocol, which was approved by the ethics committee at Sapporo International University.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figures





References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources