Oxford vaccine study highlights pick and mix approach to preclinical research
- PMID: 29321165
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j5845
Oxford vaccine study highlights pick and mix approach to preclinical research
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: I have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and have no relevant interests to declare. The BMJ declares that the systematic review of animal studies (ref 2) was coauthored by Emily Sena, who is the editor of BMJ Open Science (openscience.bmj.com).
Comment in
-
Improving the conduct, reporting, and appraisal of animal research.BMJ. 2018 Jan 10;360:j4935. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4935. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29321149 No abstract available.
-
Learning lessons from MVA85A, a failed booster vaccine for BCG.BMJ. 2018 Jan 10;360:k66. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k66. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29321154 No abstract available.
-
Helen McShane and colleagues reply to Deborah Cohen.BMJ. 2018 Jan 26;360:k236. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k236. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29374008 No abstract available.
-
Miles W Carroll replies to Deborah Cohen.BMJ. 2018 Jan 26;360:k286. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k286. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29374023 No abstract available.
-
Vaccine development might be handled more effectively in biotech companies than in academia.BMJ. 2018 Feb 21;360:k758. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k758. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29467160 No abstract available.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources