Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 10;285(1870):20171942.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1942.

Gradual plasticity alters population dynamics in variable environments: thermal acclimation in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhartdii

Affiliations

Gradual plasticity alters population dynamics in variable environments: thermal acclimation in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhartdii

Colin T Kremer et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Environmental variability is ubiquitous, but its effects on populations are not fully understood or predictable. Recent attention has focused on how rapid evolution can impact ecological dynamics via adaptive trait change. However, the impact of trait change arising from plastic responses has received less attention, and is often assumed to optimize performance and unfold on a separate, faster timescale than ecological dynamics. Challenging these assumptions, we propose that gradual plasticity is important for ecological dynamics, and present a study of the plastic responses of the freshwater green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as it acclimates to temperature changes. First, we show that C. reinhardtii's gradual acclimation responses can both enhance and suppress its performance after a perturbation, depending on its prior thermal history. Second, we demonstrate that where conventional approaches fail to predict the population dynamics of C. reinhardtii exposed to temperature fluctuations, a new model of gradual acclimation succeeds. Finally, using high-resolution data, we show that phytoplankton in lake ecosystems can experience thermal variation sufficient to make acclimation relevant. These results challenge prevailing assumptions about plasticity's interactions with ecological dynamics. Amidst the current emphasis on rapid evolution, it is critical that we also develop predictive methods accounting for plasticity.

Keywords: beneficial acclimation hypothesis; ecological forecasting; environmental variation; phenotypic plasticity; temperature; thermal performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Organismal performance changes in response to environmental change (say a shift from environment E1 to E2) through plastic and evolutionary processes over a range of temporal scales. Rapid plastic responses (a) allow individuals with a fixed genotype to change their phenotype quickly, leading to performance levels that match their reaction norm in environment E2. By contrast, when plastic responses are gradual (b), phenotypic adjustments occur slowly. During this period, individuals may exceed or fall short of their eventual performance once adjusted to E2 (i.e. the value given by their reaction norm). We refer to plastic responses that gradually improve performance following a perturbation as ‘beneficial’ (red); those that decrease performance are ‘detrimental’ (blue). Over longer exposures to E2, evolutionary responses (c) spanning generations may improve the fitness (often correlated with performance) of the population of individuals, changing the reaction norm. Note that plastic and evolutionary responses may occur simultaneously, depending on the rate of plasticity, the amount of heritable genetic variation present, and the rate at which new variation arises. Finally, while plasticity typically concerns phenotypic changes within the lifespan of an individual, some plastic responses can extend across generations (e.g. in populations of genetically identical, asexual microbes). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Depending on their prior acclimation history (a, 14°C; or b, 33°C) the acute growth rates of C. reinhardtii populations over a range of temperatures can both exceed and fall short of their long-term, acclimated growth rates (grey). Lines and shading represent GAM regression fits and 95% CIs (electronic supplementary material, table S5).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The growth rate of isogenic C. reinhardtii lines (left) at 30°C depend on whether they were previously acclimated to 14°C (black) or 30°C (grey). The pooled responses of strains 1–5 with a 14°C history do not differ from the original, mixed-genotype population (right). Points indicate average growth rate; error bars are 95% CIs.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Populations of C. reinhardtii achieve different densities over 2 days of exposure to temperatures oscillating between 14°C and 30°C, depending on fluctuation frequency and their prior acclimation history (red/blue). Observations are contrasted with predicted values from: (i) a basic exponential growth model assuming rapid acclimation (black points with 95% confidence intervals). Because of this assumption, predictions are independent of acclimation history, so only a single mean prediction is provided; and (ii) an empirically parameterized model accounting for gradual acclimation (red/blue points with 95% confidence intervals).
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Phytoplankton can experience enough thermal variation in lakes to make gradual acclimation ecologically important. (a) Depth-specific lake temperatures for Crystal Bog (left column) and Sparkling Lake (right column). (b) The difference between acute and acclimated growth rates for a 14°C acclimated population illustrates the potential effects of a range of increases in temperature (black, GAM regression line with ±1 s.e. confidence band). Shaded empirical distributions highlight the probabilities of actually experiencing these temperature increases within 24 h, depending on lake identity and movement strategy.

References

    1. Petchey OL, et al. 2015. The ecological forecast horizon, and examples of its uses and determinants. Ecol. Lett. 18, 597–611. (10.1111/ele.12443) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGill BJ, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 178–185. (10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Litchman E, Klausmeier CA. 2008. Trait-based community ecology of phytoplankton. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 615–639. (10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173549) - DOI
    1. Westoby M, Wright IJ. 2006. Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 261–268. (10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.004) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kremer CT, Williams AK, Finiguerra M, Fong AA, Kellerman A, Paver SF, Tolar BB, Toscano BJ. 2017. Realizing the potential of trait-based aquatic ecology: new tools and collaborative approaches. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 253–271. (10.1002/lno.10392) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources