Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 8:13:1.
doi: 10.1186/s12995-017-0184-3. eCollection 2018.

Simultaneous measurement of formic acid, methanol and ethanol in vitreous and blood samples of postmortem by headspace GC-FID

Affiliations

Simultaneous measurement of formic acid, methanol and ethanol in vitreous and blood samples of postmortem by headspace GC-FID

Hamideh Ghorbani et al. J Occup Med Toxicol. .

Abstract

Background: Formic acid (formate) is the main reason for toxicity and death through methanol poisoning. The simultaneous determination of methanol, ethanol, and formate in the body can help to discover the cause of death and is useful in the diagnosis of acute methanol poisoning. The measurement of formate is not yet available in Iran. With regard to the increasing rate of methanol poisoning and its related mortality in Iran, as well as the main role of formate in methanol poisoning, this study was designed to set up an analytical method for the concurrent determination of ethanol, methanol, and formate.

Methods: Following the modification of a previously developed gas chromatography method, vitreous and blood samples of 43 postmortem cases with a history of methanol intoxication were collected over a period of 2 years at the Legal Medicine Organization of Mashhad. Thereafter, ethanol, methanol, and formate concentrations were measured by headspace GC/FID. Formate esterification was performed by the methylation of formate with sulfuric acid and methanol. In order to confirm the esterification method for the production of methyl formate, we used gas chromatography with a mass detector (GC/MS) because of its higher sensitivity and accuracy. Furthermore, the correlations between formate and methanol concentrations in blood and vitreous samples, and between formate and methanol were investigated.

Results: A significant relationship was found only between methanol concentrations in blood and vitreous samples (P < 0.03).

Conclusions: In postmortems, with the passage of time since alcohol ingestion, the measurement of only methanol concentration cannot determine the degree of toxicity or the cause of death. Therefore, using the present analytical method and measurement of formic acid, we can estimate the degree of toxicity and cause of death.

Keywords: Formic acid; Measurement; Methanol; Methyl formate; Poisoning; Postmortem.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This work provided by Tehran Legal Medicine Research Center Ethics Committee.Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
HSGC/FID chromatogram of blank human vitreous spiked with methanol (200 mg/dl), ethanol (150 mg/dl) and acetonitrile (0.197 M) as an internal standard
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
HSGC/FID chromatogram of blank human vitreous spiked with methanol (200 mg/dl), methyl formate (65 mg/dl), ethanol (150 mg/dl) and acetonitrile (0.197 M) as an internal standard
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
HSGC/FID chromatogram of blank human vitreous spiked with methanol (200 mg/dl), methyl formate (65 mg/dl plus 20 μl of pure methyl formate), ethanol (150 mg/dl) and acetonitrile (0.197 M) as an internal standard
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
HSGC/FID chromatogram of a human vitreous sample of post-mortem containing, methanol (310.5 mg/dl), methyl formate (70.08 mg/dl) and acetonitrile (0.197 M) as an internal standard

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Haddad LM, Winchester JF. Clinical management of poisoning and drug overdose. 4th edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders company; 2007.
    1. Lanigan S. Final report on the safety assessment of methyl alcohol. Int J Toxicol. 2000;20:57–85. - PubMed
    1. Wiener S, et al. Toxic alcohols. 2006.
    1. Kostic MA, Dart RC. Rethinking the toxic methanol level. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2003;41(6):793–800. doi: 10.1081/CLT-120025344. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraser AD, Coffin L, Worth D. Drug and chemical metabolites in clinical toxicology investigations: the importance of ethylene glycol, methanol and cannabinoid metabolite analyses. Clin Biochem. 2002;35(7):501–511. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9120(02)00325-9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources