Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):215-224.
doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4987.

Association of Cardiovascular Biomarkers With Incident Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Affiliations
Observational Study

Association of Cardiovascular Biomarkers With Incident Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Rudolf A de Boer et al. JAMA Cardiol. .

Abstract

Importance: Nearly half of all patients with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as opposed to reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet associations of biomarkers with future heart failure subtype are incompletely understood.

Objective: To evaluate the associations of 12 cardiovascular biomarkers with incident HFpEF vs HFrEF among adults from the general population.

Design, setting, and participants: This study included 4 longitudinal community-based cohorts: the Cardiovascular Health Study (1989-1990; 1992-1993 for supplemental African-American cohort), the Framingham Heart Study (1995-1998), the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (2000-2002), and the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease study (1997-1998). Each cohort had prospective ascertainment of incident HFpEF and HFrEF. Data analysis was performed from June 25, 2015, to November 9, 2017.

Exposures: The following biomarkers were examined: N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide or brain natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity troponin T or I, C-reactive protein (CRP), urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), renin to aldosterone ratio, D-dimer, fibrinogen, soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity, galectin-3, cystatin C, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and interleukin 6.

Main outcomes and measures: Development of incident HFpEF and incident HFrEF.

Results: Among the 22 756 participants in these 4 cohorts (12 087 women and 10 669 men; mean [SD] age, 60 [13] years) in the study, during a median follow-up of 12 years, 633 participants developed incident HFpEF, and 841 developed HFrEF. In models adjusted for clinical risk factors of heart failure, 2 biomarkers were significantly associated with incident HFpEF: UACR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33; 95% CI, 1.20-1.48; P < .001) and natriuretic peptides (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16-1.40; P < .001), with suggestive associations for high-sensitivity troponin (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03-1.19; P = .008), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03-1.45; P = .02), and fibrinogen (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P = .01). By contrast, 6 biomarkers were associated with incident HFrEF: natriuretic peptides (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.41-1.68; P < .001), UACR (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32; P < .001), high-sensitivity troponin (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.29-1.46; P < .001), cystatin C (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27; P < .001), D-dimer (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.11-1.35; P < .001), and CRP (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.28; P < .001). When directly compared, natriuretic peptides, high-sensitivity troponin, and CRP were more strongly associated with HFrEF compared with HFpEF.

Conclusions and relevance: Biomarkers of renal dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammation were associated with incident HFrEF. By contrast, only natriuretic peptides and UACR were associated with HFpEF. These findings highlight the need for future studies focused on identifying novel biomarkers of the risk of HFpEF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Dr de Boer reported receiving grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and Trevena; serving as a consultant for and receiving research and/or personal honoraria from Roche; and serving as a consultant for and receiving research and/or personal honoraria from Novartis. Dr DeFilippi reported receiving research support from Roche Diagnostics; receiving consulting fees from Roche, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Alere, Metanomics, and Ortho Diagnostics; serving on the end-point committee for Radiometer and Quintiles; and receiving royalties from UpToDate. Dr Kizer reported owning stock in Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, and Amgen. Dr Blaha reported receiving grants and personal fees from Amgen and the US Food and Drug Administration, grants from Aetna, the American Heart Association, the National Institutes of Health; and personal fees from Sanofi, Regeneron, Novartis, and MedImmune. Dr Gaggin reported receiving grants from Roche and Portola and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics, Amgen, Ortho Clinical, EchoSense, and Radiometer. Dr Psaty reported serving on a data and safety monitoring board for a clinical trial funded by the manufacturer (Zoll LifeCor) and serving on the steering committee of the Yale Open Data Access Project funded by Johnson & Johnson. Ms. Bartz reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Benjamin reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health and from the American Heart Association/National Institutes of Health. Dr Januzzi reported receiving grants and personal fees from Roche, Abbott, Singulex, and Novartis and personal fees from Critical Diagnostics, Janssen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Abbvie, Pfizer, GE, and Bayer. Dr Herrington reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health. Dr Bertoni reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Dr Ho reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health and Massachusetts General Hospital. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Association of Individual Biomarkers With Incident Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) in Multivariable-Adjusted Analyses
Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for HFpEF are shown in blue and for HFrEF in grey. Three biomarkers had significantly greater HRs for HFrEF compared with HFpEF, including natriuretic peptides, high-sensitivity troponins (hs-troponins), and C-reactive protein (CRP). IL-6 indicates interleukin 6; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1; sST2, soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity; and UACR, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio. aStatistically significant difference between HRs for HFpEF vs HFrEF (using Lunn-McNeil test).

Comment in

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP, et al. ; Framingham Heart Study . Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002;106(24):3068-3072. - PubMed
    1. Ponikowski P, Anker SD, AlHabib KF, et al. Heart failure: preventing disease and death worldwide. ESC Heart Fail. 2014;1(1):4-25. - PubMed
    1. Huelsmann M, Neuhold S, Resl M, et al. PONTIAC (NT-proBNP selected prevention of cardiac events in a population of diabetic patients without a history of cardiac disease): a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(15):1365-1372. - PubMed
    1. Ledwidge M, Gallagher J, Conlon C, et al. Natriuretic peptide–based screening and collaborative care for heart failure: the STOP-HF randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;310(1):66-74. - PubMed
    1. Ho JE, Enserro D, Brouwers FP, et al. Predicting heart failure with preserved and reduced ejection fraction: the international collaboration on heart failure subtypes. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(6):e003116. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding