Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0191132.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191132. eCollection 2018.

Cost of treatment for head and neck cancer in India

Affiliations

Cost of treatment for head and neck cancer in India

Akashdeep Singh Chauhan et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

There are no published data on the cost of cancer treatment for guiding reimbursement decisions in India. The present study was designed to estimate the cost of treating head and neck cancer (HNC) with the aim of determining package rates. The present study was undertaken in the Departments of Radiotherapy and Otolaryngology of a large tertiary care hospital in North India. Economic health system costs incurred were assessed using a bottom-up methodology. Data on all resources-capital or recurrent, incurred on the delivery of HNC treatment were collected from April 2014 to March 2015. Following the cost-of-illness approach, patients were interviewed to elicit out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure. A total of INR 40,993,017 (USD 0.67 million) was spent on radiotherapy care for treating HNC during 1 year. Salaries constituted the major component (42.6%) of this cost, followed by equipment/furniture (29%), space rent (20.7%), overheads and consumables (7.7%). In addition, INR 47,191 (USD 773) per HNC patient was spent on the surgery. Furthermore, patients spent an average amount ranging from INR 12,575 (USD 206) to INR 65,257 (USD 1069) on the different treatment therapies. In terms of package rates, cobalt radiotherapy alone was the cheapest (INR 38,714, USD 634), while intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was most expensive (INR 192,914, USD 3161). The estimates from the present study could be used for developing package rates under various publicly financed health insurance schemes as well as for the planning for creation of new cancer centres.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Input-wise distribution of annual health system cost of various services delivered for head and neck cancer care.

References

    1. Ferlay J SI, Ervik M, Forman D, Bray F. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. [Internet]. IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2015 [cited 2016 June 7]. http://globocan.iarc.fr.
    1. Smith BD, Pan IW, Shih YCT, Smith GL, Harris JR, Punglia R, et al. Adoption of IntensityModulated Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer in the United States. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2011;103(10):798–809. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr100 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sheets NC, Wheeler SB, Kohler RE, Fried DV, Brown PM, Chera BS. Costs of care in a matched pair comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) versus conventional radiation therapy (CRT) for the treatment of head and neck cancer. American journal of clinical oncology. 2014;37(6):539–44. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318282a850 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murthy NS, Chaudhry K, Rath GK. Burden of cancer and projections for 2016, Indian scenario: gaps in the availability of radiotherapy treatment facilities. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2008;9(4):671–7. - PubMed
    1. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Fanily Welfare, Directorate General of Health Services, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence. Health Health Profile, 2009 (January to December). [cited 2016 20 Dec]. http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/index2.asp?slid=1068&sublinkid=721.