Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 1;7(1):10-14.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.91.

Health Priorities in French-Speaking Swiss Cantons

Affiliations

Health Priorities in French-Speaking Swiss Cantons

Philippe Chastonay et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

In Switzerland, the federal authorities, the cantons, and the communes share the responsibility of healthcare, disease prevention and health promotion policies. Yet, the cantons are in most health matters independent in their decisions, thus defining as a matter of fact their own health priorities. We examined and analysed the content of the disease prevention and health promotion plans elaborated during the last decade in six French-speaking cantons with different political contexts and resources, but quite similar population health data, in order to identify the set health priorities. The plans appear significantly inhomogeneous in their structure, scope and priorities. Most of the formal documents are short, in the 16 to 40 pages range. Core values such as equity, solidarity and sustainability are explicitly put forward in 2/6 cantonal plans. Priority health issues shared by all 6 cantons are "physical activity/sedentariness" and "nutrition/food." Mental health is explicitly mentioned in 5 cantonal plans, whereas tobacco and alcohol consumptions are mentioned 4 times. Less attention has been given to topics that appear as major public health challenges at present and in the future in Switzerland, eg, ageing of the population, rise of social inequalities, increase of vulnerable populations. Little attention has also been paid to issues like domestic violence or healthy work environments. Despite some heterogeneity, there is a common base that should make inter-cantonal collaborations possible and coordination with national strategies easily feasible.

Keywords: Disease Prevention; Health Policy; Health Priorities; Health Promotion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Baltussen R, Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2006;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-4-14. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Uneke CJ, Ezeoha AE, Ndukwe CD, Oyibo PG, Onwe F, Aulakh BK. Research priority setting for health policy and health systems strengthening in Nigeria: the policymakers and stakeholders perspective and involvement. Pan African Med J. 2013;16:10. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.16.10.2318. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Annemans L, Bogaert M, Denier Y, et al. Justice and solidarity in priority setting in healthcare. Identifying and discussing the ethical and societal issues in resource allocation. Bruxelles: Belgian Advisory Committe on Bioethics; 2013.
    1. Mitton C, Donaldson C. Health care priority setting: principles, practice and challenges. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2004;2:3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabik LM, Lie RK. Priority setting in health care: lessons from the experience in eight countries. Int J Equity Health. 2008;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-7-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources