Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jan 11;18(1):71.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3970-5.

Effects of physical activity on colorectal cancer risk among family history and body mass index subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effects of physical activity on colorectal cancer risk among family history and body mass index subgroups: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Eileen Shaw et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Physical activity is consistently associated with a reduced risk of colorectal cancer in epidemiologic studies. This association among higher risk subgroups, such as those with a first-degree family history of colorectal cancer or high body mass index remains unclear.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE for studies examining physical activity and colorectal cancer risk among higher risk subgroups through July 11, 2017. Fifteen and three studies were eligible for inclusion for body mass index and first-degree family history of colorectal cancer subgroups, respectively. Estimates of the highest to lowest comparison of physical activity for each subgroup of risk were pooled using random-effects models.

Results: The pooled associations of physical activity and colorectal cancer risk for those without and with a first-degree family history of colorectal cancer were 0.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.39-0.80) and 0.72 (95% CI = 0.39-1.32), respectively (pheterogeneity = 0.586). The pooled associations of physical activity and colorectal cancer risk for the low and high body mass index groups were 0.74 (95% CI = 0.66-0.83) and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.53-0.79), respectively (pheterogeneity = 0.389).

Conclusions: Overall, a stronger relative risk of physical activity on colorectal cancer risk was observed in the higher body mass index group, although the difference was not statistically significant, suggesting an added benefit of physical activity as a cancer prevention strategy in population groups with strong risk factors for colorectal cancer. Additional research among these subgroups is warranted.

Keywords: Body mass index; Colorectal neoplasms; Exercise; Family history; Risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity and risk of colorectal cancer with higher risk subgroups
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Adjusted relative risk estimates of physical activity and colorectal cancer risk stratified by family history, listed in chronological order (p-value across subgroups = 0.586). All estimates are for both sexes. * Family history subgroup-specific case numbers were not described for Slattery (1997) [37], thus total cases were used for case numbers from this study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Adjusted relative risk estimates of physical activity and colorectal cancer risk stratified by BMI subgroups, listed in chronological order
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Funnel plot of study estimates of colorectal cancer risk with physical activity by high and low BMI subgroups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase no. 11 [internet] Lyon: France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.
    1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canadian Cancer Society's Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics . Canadian Cancer Statistics 2015. Toronto: ON: Canadian Cancer Society; 2015.
    1. Sharaf RN, Ladabaum U. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:120–132. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haggar FA, Boushey RP. Colorectal cancer epidemiology: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2009;22:191–197. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1242458. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types