Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Sep;9(5):1144-1152.
doi: 10.1111/jdi.12801. Epub 2018 Feb 9.

Failure of monotherapy in clinical practice in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Korean National Diabetes Program

Affiliations
Observational Study

Failure of monotherapy in clinical practice in patients with type 2 diabetes: The Korean National Diabetes Program

Ja Young Jeon et al. J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Sep.

Abstract

Aims/introduction: We investigated the failure of monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in real practice settings.

Materials and methods: The Korean National Diabetes Program was a prospective, multicenter observational cohort study of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Korea. Of the 3,950 patients enrolled in the study, we studied 998 who were continuously maintained on monotherapy for at least 90 days at six participating centers. To balance the baseline characteristics of patients in each group, we used propensity matching at a 1:1 ratio (metformin vs sulfonylureas) and 4:1 ratio (metformin vs meglitinides and metformin vs alpha-glucosidase inhibitors [aGIs]). The hazard ratios (HRs) of treatments (compared with metformin) were determined by Cox's proportional hazards regression modeling.

Results: The median follow-up time was 56 months, and monotherapy failed in 45% of all patients. The annual incidences of failure were 15.6%, 21.3%, 27% and 9.6% in the metformin, sulfonylurea, meglitinide and aGI groups. Compared with metformin, sulfonylureas and meglitinides were associated with higher risks of monotherapy failure (HR 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.80; HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.13-3.27), and aGIs with risks similar to that of metformin (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44-1.45). When analyzed by failure type, sulfonylureas, meglitinides and aGIs were associated with a higher risk of a switch to other agents (HR 4.43, 95% CI 2.14-9.17; HR 18.80, 95% CI 6.21-56.93; HR 4.25, 95% CI 1.49-12.13), and aGIs with a lower risk of prescription of add-on second agents (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04-0.64).

Conclusions: Metformin was associated with a lower failure risk than were sulfonylureas and meglitinides, but a comparable aGI failure rate.

Keywords: Cohort study; Monotherapy failure; Type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan–Meier curve of monotherapy failure after propensity score matching. (a) Metformin vs sulfonylureas, (b) metformin vs meglitinides and (c) metformin vs alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors (aGI).

References

    1. American Diabetes Association . 6. Glycemic targets. Diabetes Care 2017; 40(Suppl 1): S48–S56. - PubMed
    1. American Diabetes Association . 8. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment. Diabetes Care 2017; 40(Suppl 1): S64–S74. - PubMed
    1. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group . U.K. Prospective diabetes study 16. Overview of 6 years' therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. Diabetes 1995; 44: 1249–1258. - PubMed
    1. Kahn SE. Clinical review 135: the importance of beta‐cell failure in the development and progression of type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2001; 86: 4047–4058. - PubMed
    1. DeFronzo RA, Eldor R, Abdul‐Ghani M. Pathophysiologic approach to therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013; 36(Suppl 2): S127–S138. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types