Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Nov 1;56(12):712-7.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)91121-x.

Primary angiographic success rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Primary angiographic success rates of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

H V Anderson et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Three distinct periods in catheter design have been identified since the advent of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in 1977. In the first period PTCA was performed using a double-lumen balloon catheter that had a fixed, flexible guidewire at the tip. In the second period, an independent, steerable guidewire and the steerable catheter system were used. In the third period, low-profile catheters were introduced. A total of 2,969 patients who had single-vessel PTCA of a native coronary artery was separated into groups according to the period during which PTCA was performed. Introduction of the steerable catheter system was accompanied by improvement in primary success rate in PTCA attempts on the right coronary artery (78% vs 88%, p less than 0.005). Introduction of the low-profile catheter was accompanied by improved primary success in PTCA attempts on the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (90% vs 94%, p less than 0.005). The percentage of PTCA attempts on the LAD decreased over the 3 periods (70% to 60% to 56%), while the percentage of attempts on the left circumflex artery increased (7% to 12% to 16%). Before steerable and low-profile catheters were used, there were significant differences in ability to reach and cross stenoses among the 3 major coronary arteries. These differences no longer exist. These results indicate that technical improvements and operator experience have made stenoses in all 3 major coronary arteries equally accessible to dilatation catheters and that primary success rates and reasons for failure in these arteries are now similar.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources