Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 12;18(1):130.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5039-z.

Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil

Affiliations

Microcephaly epidemic related to the Zika virus and living conditions in Recife, Northeast Brazil

Wayner Vieira de Souza et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Starting in August 2015, there was an increase in the number of cases of neonatal microcephaly in Northeast Brazil. These findings were identified as being an epidemic of microcephaly related to Zika virus (ZIKV) infection. The present study aims to analyse the spatial distribution of microcephaly cases in Recife (2015-2016), which is in Northeast Brazil, and its association with the living conditions in this city.

Methods: This was an ecological study that used data from reported cases of microcephaly from the State Health Department of Pernambuco (August 2015 to July 2016). The basic spatial unit of analysis was the 94 districts of Recife. The case definition of microcephaly was: neonates with a head circumference of less than the cut-off point of -2 standard deviations below the mean value from the established Fenton growth curve. As an indicator of the living conditions of the 94 districts, the percentage of heads of households with an income of less than twice the minimum wage was calculated. The districts were classified into four homogeneous strata using the K-means clustering algorithm. We plotted the locations of each microcephaly case over a layer of living conditions.

Results: During the study period, 347 microcephaly cases were reported, of which 142 (40.9%) fulfilled the definition of a microcephaly case. Stratification of the 94 districts resulted in the identification of four strata. The highest stratum in relation to the living conditions presented the lowest prevalence rate of microcephaly, and the overall difference between this rate and the rates of the other strata was statistically significant. The results of the Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated that there was a strong association between a higher prevalence of microcephaly and poor living conditions. After the first 6 months of the study period, there were no microcephaly cases recorded within the population living in the richest socio-economic strata.

Conclusion: This study showed that those residing in areas with precarious living conditions had a higher prevalence of microcephaly compared with populations with better living conditions.

Keywords: Brazil; Ecological study; Socio-economic; Zika.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author information

The investigators are from the Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group, Brazilian Ministry of Health, Pan American Health Organization and State Health Department of Pernambuco.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We received permission of Pernambuco Health State Department to use the anonymous data for research purpose.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We declare that there are no competing interests to disclose.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Location of the capital city of Recife, Pernambuco State, Brazil
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Neighbourhoods and living conditions of Recife, Northeast Brazil, according to the 2010 census data
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Microcephaly cases and living conditions of the residents of Recife, Brazil

Comment in

References

    1. Wikan N, Smith DR. Zika virus: history of a newly emerging arbovirus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:e119–e126. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30010-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Plourde AR, Bloch EM. A Literature Review of Zika Virus. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2016;22:1185–92. 10.3201/eid2207.151990. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duffy MR, Chen T-H, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2536–2543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steffens I, Wilson K. Chikungunya and Zika virus Special edition. Eurosurveillance. 2014; October:74.
    1. Musso D, Gubler DJ. Zika Virus. Nature. 2016;11:10–20.

Publication types