Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS)
- PMID: 29330169
- DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314165
Inter-rater reliability in the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS)
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the level of inter-rater reliability between nursing staff for the Paediatric Observation Priority Score (POPS).
Design: Retrospective observational study.
Setting: Single-centre paediatric emergency department.
Participants: 12 participants from a convenience sample of 21 nursing staff.
Interventions: Participants were shown video footage of three pre-recorded paediatric assessments and asked to record their own POPS for each child. The participants were blinded to the original, in-person POPS. Further data were gathered in the form of a questionnaire to determine the level of training and experience the candidate had using the POPS score prior to undertaking this study.
Main outcome measures: Inter-rater reliability among participants scoring of the POPS.
Results: Overall kappa value for case 1 was 0.74 (95% CI 0.605 to 0.865), case 2 was 1 (perfect agreement) and case 3 was 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.744).
Conclusion: This study suggests there is good inter-rater reliability between different nurses' use of POPS in assessing sick children in the emergency department.
Keywords: early warning score; emergency severity index; inter-rater reliability; nursing.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources