Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb 14;84(5):e02755-17.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.02755-17. Print 2018 Mar 1.

Microbial Diversity and Putative Opportunistic Pathogens in Dishwasher Biofilm Communities

Affiliations

Microbial Diversity and Putative Opportunistic Pathogens in Dishwasher Biofilm Communities

Prem Krishnan Raghupathi et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. .

Abstract

Extreme habitats are not only limited to natural environments, but also exist in manmade systems, for instance, household appliances such as dishwashers. Limiting factors, such as high temperatures, high and low pHs, high NaCl concentrations, presence of detergents, and shear force from water during washing cycles, define microbial survival in this extreme system. Fungal and bacterial diversity in biofilms isolated from rubber seals of 24 different household dishwashers was investigated using next-generation sequencing. Bacterial genera such as Pseudomonas, Escherichia, and Acinetobacter, known to include opportunistic pathogens, were represented in most samples. The most frequently encountered fungal genera in these samples belonged to Candida, Cryptococcus, and Rhodotorula, also known to include opportunistic pathogenic representatives. This study showed how specific conditions of the dishwashers impact the abundance of microbial groups and investigated the interkingdom and intrakingdom interactions that shape these biofilms. The age, usage frequency, and hardness of incoming tap water of dishwashers had significant impact on bacterial and fungal community compositions. Representatives of Candida spp. were found at the highest prevalence (100%) in all dishwashers and are assumed to be one of the first colonizers in recently purchased dishwashers. Pairwise correlations in tested microbiomes showed that certain bacterial groups cooccur, as did the fungal groups. In mixed bacterial-fungal biofilms, early adhesion, contact, and interactions were vital in the process of biofilm formation, where mixed complexes of bacteria and fungi could provide a preliminary biogenic structure for the establishment of these biofilms.IMPORTANCE Worldwide demand for household appliances, such as dishwashers and washing machines, is increasing, as is the number of immunocompromised individuals. The harsh conditions in household dishwashers should prevent the growth of most microorganisms. However, our research shows that persisting polyextremotolerant groups of microorganisms in household appliances are well established under these unfavorable conditions and supported by the biofilm mode of growth. The significance of our research is in identifying the microbial composition of biofilms formed on dishwasher rubber seals, how diverse abiotic conditions affect microbiota, and which key microbial members were represented in early colonization and contamination of dishwashers, as these appliances can present a source of domestic cross-contamination that leads to broader medical impacts.

Keywords: abiotic conditions; biofilms; dishwasher; fungal-bacterial interactions; opportunistic fungi; putative pathogens.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Biofilm formed on rubber seals in residential DWs. Microbial biofilm formation on DW rubber seal; the square (in red) represents the 1-cm2 sampling site. Biofilm samples from 1 cm2 were collected by scraping the surface of rubber seal with a sterile scalpel for DNA extraction and further analysis. Sampling was done in situ, with the seal at its original place.
FIG 2
FIG 2
The different bacterial and fungal genera are presented across 21 DW samples. The numbers represent the sample count, i.e., the number of DW samples that contained the representative genera.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Principal component plots of redundancy analysis (RDA) performed on log10-transformed 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing data using years of use (A) and frequency of use (B) as explanatory factors. Significance of the model, axes, and factors was determined by ANOVA (999 permutations; P < 0.05). Asterisks stand for the level of significance as follows: *, 0.05 ≤ P < 0.01; **, 0.01 ≤ P < 0.001. Year, years of use (0 to 3, 5 to 7, and 8 years); Freq, frequency of use (1 to 3, 7, and ≥14 times/week).
FIG 4
FIG 4
Principal component plots of redundancy analysis (RDA) performed on log10-transformed ITS rRNA amplicon sequencing data, using years of use (A), frequency of use (B), and water hardness (C) as explanatory factors. Significance of the model, axes, and factors was determined by ANOVA (999 permutations; P < 0.05). Asterisks stand for the level of significance as follows: *, 0.05 ≤ P < 0.01; **, 0.01 ≤ P < 0.001. Year, years of use (0 to 3, 5 to 7, and 8 years); Freq, frequency of use (1 to 3, 7 and ≥14 times/week); H, hard water; MH, moderately hard water; SH, slightly hard water; MS, moderately soft water.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Impact of age and frequency of use of DWs on the relative abundance of bacterial taxa present in the samples. (A and B) Mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of percent abundance in samples grouped by years of use (A) and frequency of use (B) at the phylum level. (C and D) Heatmap of significant bacterial genera in DW samples grouped by years of use (0 to 4, 5 to 7, and 8 years) (C) and frequency of use (1 to 3, 7, and ≥14 times/week) (D), respectively.
FIG 6
FIG 6
Impact of DW age and frequency of use on the relative abundance of fungal taxa present in the samples. (A and B) Mean ± SEM of percent abundance in samples grouped by years of use (A), frequency of use (B), and water hardness (C) at the phylum level. (D, E, and F) Heatmap of significant fungal genera in DW samples grouped by years of use (0 to 4, 5 to 7, and 8 years) (D), frequency of use (E), and influent water hardness (F), respectively. H, hard water; MH, moderately hard water; SH, slightly hard water; MS, moderately soft water.

References

    1. de Gannes V, Eudoxie G, Bekele I, Hickey WJ. 2015. Relations of microbiome characteristics to edaphic properties of tropical soils from Trinidad. Front Microbiol 6:1045. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01045. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frey B, Rime T, Phillips M, Stierli B, Hajdas I, Widmer F, Hartmann M. 2016. Microbial diversity in European alpine permafrost and active layers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ventosa A, de la Haba RR, Sanchez-Porro C, Papke RT. 2015. Microbial diversity of hypersaline environments: a metagenomic approach. Curr Opin Microbiol 25:80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.05.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crits-Christoph A, Robinson CK, Barnum T, Fricke WF, Davila AF, Jedynak B, McKay CP, Diruggiero J. 2013. Colonization patterns of soil microbial communities in the Atacama Desert. Microbiome 1:28. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-28. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhullar K, Waglechner N, Pawlowski A, Koteva K, Banks ED, Johnston MD, Barton HA, Wright GD. 2012. Antibiotic resistance is prevalent in an isolated cave microbiome. PLoS One 7:e34953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034953. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources