Time-lapse algorithms and morphological selection of day-5 embryos for transfer: a preclinical validation study
- PMID: 29331237
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.036
Time-lapse algorithms and morphological selection of day-5 embryos for transfer: a preclinical validation study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the agreement between published time-lapse algorithms in selecting the best day-5 embryo for transfer, as well as the agreement between these algorithms and embryologists.
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: Private in vitro fertilization center.
Patient(s): Four hundred and twenty-eight embryos from 100 cycles cultured in the EmbryoScope.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Interalgorithm agreement as assessed by the Fleiss kappa coefficient.
Result(s): Of seven published algorithms analyzed in this study, only one of the 18 possible pairs showed very good agreement (κ = 0.867); one pair showed good agreement (κ = 0.725), four pairs showed fair agreement (κ = 0.226-0.334), and the remaining 12 pairs showed poor agreement (κ = 0.008-0.149). Even in the best-case scenario, the majority of algorithms showed poor to moderate kappa scores (κ = 0.337-0.722) for the assessment of agreement between the embryo(s) selected as "best" by the algorithms and the embryo that was chosen by the majority (>5) of embryologists, as well as with the embryo that was actually selected in the laboratory on the day of transfer (κ = 0.315-0.802).
Conclusion(s): The results of this study raise concerns as to whether the tested algorithms are applicable in different clinical settings, emphasizing the need for proper external validation before clinical use.
Keywords: Agreement; algorithm; embryologist; morphokinetics; time-lapse.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):307-314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew330. Epub 2016 Dec 28. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28031323
-
Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?Hum Reprod. 2022 Sep 30;37(10):2275-2290. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac171. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35944167
-
Examining the efficacy of six published time-lapse imaging embryo selection algorithms to predict implantation to demonstrate the need for the development of specific, in-house morphokinetic selection algorithms.Fertil Steril. 2017 Mar;107(3):613-621. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.014. Epub 2017 Jan 6. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28069186
-
What does morphokinetics add to embryo selection and in-vitro fertilization outcomes?Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;27(3):193-200. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000166. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25699478 Review.
-
Time-lapse imaging of cleavage divisions in embryo quality assessment.Reproduction. 2017 Aug;154(2):R37-R53. doi: 10.1530/REP-17-0004. Epub 2017 Apr 13. Reproduction. 2017. PMID: 28408705 Review.
Cited by
-
The synergy of morphokinetic parameters and sHLA-G in cleavage embryo enhancing implantation rates.Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024 Jul 16;12:1417375. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1417375. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024. PMID: 39081861 Free PMC article.
-
A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.Hum Reprod. 2022 Apr 1;37(4):708-717. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac020. Hum Reprod. 2022. PMID: 35143661 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Predicting IVF live -birth probability using time-lapse data: Implications of including or excluding age in a day 2 embryo transfer model.PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0318480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318480. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39999051 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an artificial intelligence based model for predicting the euploidy of blastocysts in PGT-A treatments.Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 9;13(1):2322. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29319-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36759639 Free PMC article.
-
Can Time-Lapse Incubation and Monitoring Be Beneficial to Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Day 3 Double Embryo Transfer.Front Physiol. 2022 Jan 4;12:794601. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.794601. eCollection 2021. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35058802 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources