Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach
- PMID: 29333005
- PMCID: PMC5759057
- DOI: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_202_15
Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to analyze treatment outcomes of intracranial ependymoma (ICE) treated at our institute with multimodality approach.
Materials and methods: Demography, treatment details, and survival data of 40 patients (2005-2012) were collected in a predesigned pro forma. Kaplan Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and the impact of prognostic factors was determined using univariate analysis (log-rank test). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazard model. SPSS version 21.0 was used for all statistical analysis.
Results: Male:female ratio was 29:11. Gross total resection: subtotal resection or less was 42.5%: 57.5%. A total of 16 patients (40%) had anaplastic histology. All except two patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Four patients received concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]) and 10 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (6 carboplatin plus etoposide; 4 TMZ). Median follows up was 18 months (2-60 months). Median DFS for the entire cohort was 22.42 months. The estimated 1, 2, and 3 years DFS was found to be 58.5%, 41%, and 30.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients receiving higher radiation dose (56 Gray vs. 60 Gray; hazard ratio [HR] 0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.142-0.9553; P = 0.02) and lower MIB labeling index (<20 vs. ≥20; HR 0.238; 95% CI 0.092-0.617; P = 0.001) had a better DFS. Higher radiation dose continued to be an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 0.212; 95% CI 0.064-0.856; P = 0.03).
Conclusion: ICE has guarded prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy to a higher radiation dose improves survival. Higher MIB labeling index connotes a dismal survival despite the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Keywords: Chemotherapy; ependymoma; intracranial; radiation.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of adult medulloblastoma treated with a multimodality approach: A tertiary cancer center experience.South Asian J Cancer. 2015 Oct-Dec;4(4):174-8. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.175954. South Asian J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26981508 Free PMC article.
-
The value of high-dose radiotherapy in intracranial ependymoma.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Jun;66(6):e27697. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27697. Epub 2019 Mar 13. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30865382
-
Outcomes of pediatric glioblastoma treated with adjuvant chemoradiation with temozolomide and correlation with prognostic factors.Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015 Apr-Jun;36(2):99-104. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.158838. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26157286 Free PMC article.
-
Supratentorial hemispheric ependymomas: an analysis of 109 adults for survival and prognostic factors.J Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;125(2):410-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.JNS151187. Epub 2016 Jan 8. J Neurosurg. 2016. PMID: 26745489 Review.
-
The Effects of Surgery and Adjuvant Therapy on Survival Outcomes in Clear Cell Ependymomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:229-240. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.044. Epub 2020 Sep 16. World Neurosurg. 2021. PMID: 32949795
Cited by
-
An Insight into Pathophysiological Features and Therapeutic Advances on Ependymoma.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 28;13(13):3221. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133221. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34203272 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spinal Myxopapillary Ependymoma: A Rare Case and Review of Management Strategies.Cureus. 2023 May 23;15(5):e39381. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39381. eCollection 2023 May. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37362475 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic factors of pediatric ependymomas at a National Cancer Reference Center in Peru.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 17;13:1331790. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1331790. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38298447 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of dose, volume, and outcome in children with localized, intracranial ependymoma treated with proton therapy within the prospective KiProReg Study.Neuro Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;24(7):1193-1202. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab301. Neuro Oncol. 2022. PMID: 34964901 Free PMC article.
-
Is H3K27me3 status really a strong prognostic indicator for pediatric posterior fossa ependymomas? A single surgeon, single center experience.Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 May;36(5):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04518-5. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020. PMID: 32025869
References
-
- Gondi V, Vogelbaum MA, Grimm S, Mehta MP. Primary intracranial neoplasm. In: Halperin EC, Wazer DE, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Perez and Brady's Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 669–70.
-
- Freeman CR, Farmer JP, Taylor RE. Central Nervous System Tumors in Children. In: Halperin EC, Wazer DE, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Perez and Brady's Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 1643–5.
-
- Salazar OM, Castro-Vita H, VanHoutte P, Rubin P, Aygun C. Improved survival in cases of intracranial ependymoma after radiation therapy. Late report and recommendations. J Neurosurg. 1983;59:652–9. - PubMed
-
- Goldwein JW, Corn BW, Finlay JL, Packer RJ, Rorke LB, Schut L. Is craniospinal irradiation required to cure children with malignant (anaplastic) intracranial ependymomas? Cancer. 1991;67:2766–71. - PubMed
-
- Paulino AC. The local field in infratentorial ependymoma: Does the entire posterior fossa need to be treated? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:757–61. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources