Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct-Dec;38(4):420-426.
doi: 10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_202_15.

Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach

Affiliations

Prognostic Factors and Survival Outcomes of Intracranial Ependymoma Treated with Multimodality Approach

Kunhi Parambath Haresh et al. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2017 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to analyze treatment outcomes of intracranial ependymoma (ICE) treated at our institute with multimodality approach.

Materials and methods: Demography, treatment details, and survival data of 40 patients (2005-2012) were collected in a predesigned pro forma. Kaplan Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS) and the impact of prognostic factors was determined using univariate analysis (log-rank test). Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazard model. SPSS version 21.0 was used for all statistical analysis.

Results: Male:female ratio was 29:11. Gross total resection: subtotal resection or less was 42.5%: 57.5%. A total of 16 patients (40%) had anaplastic histology. All except two patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Four patients received concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide [TMZ]) and 10 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (6 carboplatin plus etoposide; 4 TMZ). Median follows up was 18 months (2-60 months). Median DFS for the entire cohort was 22.42 months. The estimated 1, 2, and 3 years DFS was found to be 58.5%, 41%, and 30.7%, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients receiving higher radiation dose (56 Gray vs. 60 Gray; hazard ratio [HR] 0.366; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.142-0.9553; P = 0.02) and lower MIB labeling index (<20 vs. ≥20; HR 0.238; 95% CI 0.092-0.617; P = 0.001) had a better DFS. Higher radiation dose continued to be an independent prognostic factor on multivariate analysis (HR 0.212; 95% CI 0.064-0.856; P = 0.03).

Conclusion: ICE has guarded prognosis. Adjuvant radiotherapy to a higher radiation dose improves survival. Higher MIB labeling index connotes a dismal survival despite the use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; ependymoma; intracranial; radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan Meier estimates of disease free survival of the entire cohort
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of radiation dose on disease free survival
Figure 3
Figure 3
Impact of MIB labelling index on disease free survival

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gondi V, Vogelbaum MA, Grimm S, Mehta MP. Primary intracranial neoplasm. In: Halperin EC, Wazer DE, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Perez and Brady's Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 669–70.
    1. Freeman CR, Farmer JP, Taylor RE. Central Nervous System Tumors in Children. In: Halperin EC, Wazer DE, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Perez and Brady's Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. pp. 1643–5.
    1. Salazar OM, Castro-Vita H, VanHoutte P, Rubin P, Aygun C. Improved survival in cases of intracranial ependymoma after radiation therapy. Late report and recommendations. J Neurosurg. 1983;59:652–9. - PubMed
    1. Goldwein JW, Corn BW, Finlay JL, Packer RJ, Rorke LB, Schut L. Is craniospinal irradiation required to cure children with malignant (anaplastic) intracranial ependymomas? Cancer. 1991;67:2766–71. - PubMed
    1. Paulino AC. The local field in infratentorial ependymoma: Does the entire posterior fossa need to be treated? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:757–61. - PubMed