Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 11:6:2119.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13180.1. eCollection 2017.

Health Technology Assessment capacity development in low- and middle-income countries: Experiences from the international units of HITAP and NICE

Affiliations

Health Technology Assessment capacity development in low- and middle-income countries: Experiences from the international units of HITAP and NICE

Sripen Tantivess et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is policy research that aims to inform priority setting and resource allocation. HTA is increasingly recognized as a useful policy tool in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where there is a substantial need for evidence to guide Universal Health Coverage policies, such as benefit coverage, quality improvement interventions and quality standards, all of which aim at improving the efficiency and equity of the healthcare system. The Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Thailand, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), UK, are national HTA organizations providing technical support to governments in LMICs to build up their priority setting capacity. This paper draws lessons from their capacity building programs in India, Colombia, Myanmar, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Such experiences suggest that it is not only technical capacity, for example analytical techniques for conducting economic evaluation, but also management, coordination and communication capacity that support the generation and use of HTA evidence in the respective settings. The learned lessons may help guide the development of HTA capacity in other LMICs.

Keywords: capacity building; health policy; health technology assessment; low- and middle-income countries; priority setting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: At the time of preparation of this manuscript, YT was program leader, and ST and NT were staff of HITAP. KC was director of NICE International.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Conceptual framework for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) capacity development programs in LMICs.

References

    1. WHO: The World Health Report 2013: Research for Universal Health Coverage. Geneva.2013. Reference Source
    1. INAHTA: HTA resources.2010; [cited 2010 November 23]. Reference Source
    1. Hailey D, Babidge W, Cameron A, et al. : HTA agencies and decision makers: An INAHTA guidance document.Stockholm: INAHTA.2010. Reference Source
    1. WHO Regional Committee for Pan America: Health technology assessment and incorporation into health systems. (Resolution CSP28/11), Washington, DC.2012. Reference Source
    1. WHO Regional Committee for Southeast Asia: Health intervention and technology assessment in support of universal health coverage. (Resolution SEA/RC66/R4), New Delhi.2013. Reference Source

LinkOut - more resources