Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 15;15(1):3.
doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0207-5.

Options for reducing HIV transmission related to the dead space in needles and syringes

Affiliations

Options for reducing HIV transmission related to the dead space in needles and syringes

William A Zule et al. Harm Reduct J. .

Abstract

Background: When shared by people who inject drugs, needles and syringes with different dead space may affect the probability of HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission differently.

Methods: We measured dead space in 56 needle and syringe combinations obtained from needle and syringe programs across 17 countries in Europe and Asia. We also calculated the amounts of blood and HIV that would remain in different combinations following injection and rinsing.

Results: Syringe barrel capacities ranged from 0.5 to 20 mL. Needles ranged in length from 8 to 38 mm. The average dead space was 3 μL in low dead space syringes with permanently attached needles, 13 μL in high dead space syringes with low dead space needles, 45 μL in low dead space syringes with high dead space needles, and 99 μL in high dead space syringes with high dead space needles. Among low dead space designs, calculated volumes of blood and HIV viral burden were lowest for low dead space syringes with permanently attached needles and highest for low dead space syringes with high dead space needles.

Conclusion: The dead space in different low dead space needle and syringe combinations varied substantially. To reduce HIV transmission related to syringe sharing, needle and syringe programs need to combine this knowledge with the needs of their clients.

Keywords: Dead space; HIV; Hepatitis C virus; Needle and syringe programs; Needles; People who inject drugs; Syringes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Needle and syringe designs that affect dead space. a Standard (high dead space) syringe with standard needle. Average dead space (99 μL). b Low dead space syringe with permanently attached needle. Average dead space (3 μL). c Standard syringe with low dead space needle. No needle and syringe programs sent us low dead space needles (c) or a low dead space syringe (d) with a standard needle. However, use of both of these has become more common. We obtained samples of c and d from the manufacturers: c Covidien and d Henke-Sass
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a City, country, and types of syringes sent. b Examples of needles and syringes from different cities
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Distribution of needle lengths and gauges. The size of the dots indicates the number of different needles of a specific length and gauge that we received. The smallest dots represent 1 needle and the largest dot represents 22 needles. b Dead space in needle and syringe combinations, by design
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
a Volume of blood by barrel capacity and low dead space permanently attached needle or high dead space detachable needle after injection, booting, first rinse, and second rinse. b Volume of blood by low dead space design after injection, booting, first rinse, and second rinse. c HIV viral burden after injection, booting, first rinse, and second rinse. The asterisk indicates low dead space syringe with permanently attached needle

References

    1. Degenhardt L, Mathers BM, Wirtz AL, Wolfe D, Kamarulzaman A, Carrieri MP, et al. What has been achieved in HIV prevention, treatment and care for people who inject drugs, 2010–2012? A review of the six highest burden countries. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(1):53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.08.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathers BM, Degenhardt L, Phillips B, Wiessing L, Hickman M, Strathdee SA, et al. Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review. Lancet (London, England) 2008;372(9651):1733–1745. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61311-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerr T, Small W, Buchner C, Zhang R, Li K, Montaner J, et al. Syringe sharing and HIV incidence among injection drug users and increased access to sterile syringes. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(8):1449–1453. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.178467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wodak A, Cooney A. Effectiveness of sterile needle and syringe programmes. Int J Drug Policy. 2005;16:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.02.004. - DOI
    1. World Health Organization . WHO, UNODC, UNAIDS technical guide for countries to set targets for universal access to HIV prevention, treatment and care for injecting drug users—2012 revision. 2012.

Publication types