Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Jun;178(6):1280-1287.
doi: 10.1111/bjd.16340. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

Systematic review of atopic dermatitis disease definition in studies using routinely collected health data

M P Dizon  1 , A M Yu  2 , R K Singh  3 , J Wan  4 , M-M Chren  5 , C Flohr  6 , J I Silverberg  7 , D J Margolis  4   8 , S M Langan  9 , K Abuabara  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review of atopic dermatitis disease definition in studies using routinely collected health data

M P Dizon et al. Br J Dermatol. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Routinely collected electronic health data obtained for administrative and clinical purposes are increasingly used to study atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods for identifying AD patients in routinely collected electronic health data differ, and it is unknown how this might affect study results.

Objectives: To evaluate how patients with AD have been identified in studies using routinely collected electronic health data, to determine whether these methods were validated and to estimate how the method for identifying patients with AD affected variability in prevalence estimates.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies using routinely collected electronic health data that reported on AD as a primary outcome. Studies of localized AD and other types of dermatitis were excluded. The protocol for this review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016037968).

Results: In total, 59 studies met eligibility criteria. Medical diagnosis codes for inclusion and exclusion, number of occasions of a code, type of provider associated with a code and prescription data were used to identify patients with AD. Only two studies described validation of their methods and no study reported on disease severity. Prevalence estimates ranged from 0·18% to 38·33% (median 4·91%) and up to threefold variation in prevalence was introduced by differences in the method for identifying patients with AD.

Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the need for clear reporting of methods for identifying patients with AD in routinely collected electronic health data to allow for meaningful interpretation and comparison of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brunner PM, Silverberg JI, Guttman‐Yassky E et al Increasing comorbidities suggest that atopic dermatitis is a systemic disorder. J Invest Dermatol 2017; 137:18–25. - PubMed
    1. Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A et al [The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely‐collected health Data (RECORD) statement]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2016; 116:33–48 (in German). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hanifin JM. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 1980; 92 (Suppl.):44–7.
    1. Asher MI, Keil U, Anderson HR et al International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC): rationale and methods. Eur Respir J 1995; 8:483–91. - PubMed
    1. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL et al Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2014; 70:338–51. - PMC - PubMed