Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;6(1):24-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2017.10.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

Malleable Penile Implant Is an Effective Therapeutic Option in Men With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction

Affiliations

Malleable Penile Implant Is an Effective Therapeutic Option in Men With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction

Mohamad Habous et al. Sex Med. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is typically the preferred implant for Peyronie's disease (PD) and malleable penile prostheses (MPPs) have been discouraged.

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness and patient satisfaction of the MPP vs IPP in patients with PD.

Methods: Men with PD and erectile dysfunction who elected for penile implant surgery constituted the study population. Preoperatively, demographic and comorbidity parameters were recorded. Curvature was measured with a goniometer at maximum rigidity after intracavernosal injection of a vasoactive agent. Postoperatively, overall satisfaction was measured at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months on 5-point Likert scale from 1 (dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied).

Results: 166 men with a mean age of 59 ± 10 years were analyzed. The mean preoperative curvature in the entire cohort was 65° (range = 30-130°). 94% of patients with MPP had total resolution of their curvature at the end of the operation, whereas 8 patients (6%) had residual curvature (25-40°). In the IPP group 25 of 30 (83.3%) had a straight penis at the end of surgery, whereas 5 of 30 (16.7%) had residual curvature, with the mean magnitude being 33° in the MPP group and 30° in the IPP group. 86% of all patients had diabetes. There were no differences between the 2 implant groups in age, hemoglobin A1c, body mass index, or smoking status. The mean patient satisfaction was 4.42 ± 0.70 (range = 2-5) and there was no difference between the 2 groups. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 months (range = 6-29 months).

Conclusion: We found that the MPP is as effective as the IPP in curvature correction in patients with PD, with similar patient satisfaction for the 2 groups. Habous M, Farag M, Tealab A, et al. Malleable Penile Implant Is an Effective Therapeutic Option in Men With Peyronie's Disease and Erectile Dysfunction. Sex Med 2018;6:24-29.

Keywords: Erectile Dysfunction; Inflatable Penile Prosthesis; Malleable Penile Prosthesis; Penile Curvature; Penile Deformity; Peyronie’s Disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of implant outcomes in the 2 groups. IPP = inflatable penile prosthesis; MPP = malleable penile prosthesis.

References

    1. Carson C.C. Penile prostheses: are they still relevant? BJU Int. 2003;91:176–177. - PubMed
    1. Ralph D., Gonzalez-Cadavid N., Mirone V. The management of Peyronie’s disease: evidence-based 2010 guidelines. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2359–2374. - PubMed
    1. Levine L.A., Larsen S.M. Surgery for Peyronie’s disease. Asian J Androl. 2013;15:27–34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaudhary M., Sheikh N., Asterling S. Peyronie’s disease with erectile dysfunction: penile modeling over inflatable penile prostheses. Urology. 2005;65:760–764. - PubMed
    1. Wilson S.K., Delk J.R., II A new treatment for Peyronie’s disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol. 1994;152:1121–1123. - PubMed