Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May:189:29-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Jan 11.

Relation Between Dietary Essential Fatty Acid Intake and Dry Eye Disease and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Postmenopausal Women

Affiliations

Relation Between Dietary Essential Fatty Acid Intake and Dry Eye Disease and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction in Postmenopausal Women

Jillian F Ziemanski et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between omega-3 (n-3) and omega-6 (n-6) fatty acids with dry eye disease (DED) and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: Postmenopausal women (n = 439) underwent a clinical evaluation and completed the Vio Food Frequency Questionnaire to estimate their dietary intake of n-3s and n-6s. Subjects were categorized into 2 binary classifications based on whether or not they had (1) DED and (2) MGD. Mean intake of dietary fatty acids was compared with 2-sample t tests. Univariate logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratios for each condition associated with each quintile of n-3s, n-6s, and n-6:n-3 ratios.

Results: For DED vs non-DED, there were no significant differences in n-3 intake (1.95 ± 1.47 g vs 1.92 ± 1.24 g, P = .86), n-6 intake (15.58 ± 11.56 g vs 15.44 ± 10.61 g, P = .91), and n-6:n-3 (8.30 ± 2.57 vs 8.30 ± 2.57, P = .99). For MGD vs non-MGD, there were no significant differences in n-3 intake (1.87 ± 1.35 vs 1.96 ± 1.39, P = .61), n-6 intake (15.26 ± 11.85 vs 15.62 ± 10.93, P = .80), and n-6:n-3 (8.35 ± 2.94 vs 8.28 ± 2.42, P = .84). The odds ratios (OR) for DED did not differ significantly from 1.0 for n-3, n-6, or n-6:n-3. High n-3 consumption (OR = 0.22 [0.06-0.78]) and moderate n-6 consumption (OR = 0.37 [0.15-0.91]) were associated with a decreased frequency of MGD.

Conclusions: Dietary consumption of n-3s and n-6s showed no association with DED, but high n-3 consumption and moderate n-6 consumption were protective against MGD in this large sample of postmenopausal women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Enrollment flow chart. A total of 439 postmenopausal women were enrolled in the Dry Eye in Menopause study, but 117 were excluded from this analysis owing to baseline omega fatty acid supplementation (n = 116) or incomplete data (n = 1). Of the 322 women in the DED/non-DED analysis, 192 met the criteria to be diagnosed with DED, while 130 did not. Of the same 322 women in the MGD/non-MGD analysis, 3 were excluded owing to incomplete data. Of the 319 remaining, 87 met the criteria to be diagnosed with MGD, while 232 did not. DED = dry eye disease; MGD = meibomian gland dysfunction.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Odds ratio plot of dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction with respect to omega-3 fatty acid consumption in postmenopausal women. Model 1 controlled for age, race, body mass index, total dietary fat intake, and presence or absence of an eye examination in the previous 12 months. Model 2 controlled for systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and arthritis, in addition to the variables controlled for in Model 1. DED = dry eye disease; MGD = meibomian gland dysfunction.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Odds ratio plot of dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction with respect to omega-6 fatty acid consumption in postmenopausal women. Model 1 controlled for age, race, body mass index, total dietary fat intake, and presence or absence of an eye examination in the previous 12 months. Model 2 controlled for systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and arthritis, in addition to the variables controlled for in Model 1. DED = dry eye disease; MGD = meibomian gland dysfunction.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Odds ratio plot of dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction with respect to omega-6:omega-3 fatty acid consumption in postmenopausal women. Model 1 controlled for age, race, body mass index, total dietary fat intake, and presence or absence of an eye examination in the previous 12 months. Model 2 controlled for systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and arthritis, in addition to the variables controlled for in Model 1. DED = dry eye disease; MGD = meibomian gland dysfunction.

References

    1. Knop E, Knop N, Millar T, Obata H, Sullivan DA. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology of the meibomian gland. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1938–1978. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bron AJ, Yokoi N, Gaffney EA, Tiffany JM. A solute gradient in the tear meniscus. II. Implications for lid margin disease, including meibomian gland dysfunction. Ocul Surf. 2011;9(2):92–97. - PubMed
    1. Horwath-Winter J, Berghold A, Schmut O, et al. Evaluation of the clinical course of dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(10):1364–1368. - PubMed
    1. Schaumberg DA, Nichols JJ, Papas EB, Tong L, Uchino M, Nichols KK. The International Workshop on Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(4):1994–2005. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ding J, Sullivan DA. Aging and dry eye disease. Exp Gerontol. 2012;47(7):483–490. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms