Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Summer;22(3):192-202.
doi: 10.1310/sci2016-00027.

Perceptions of Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries/Disorders

Sara M Locatelli  1   2 , Bella Etingen  1   2 , Allen Heinemann  3   4 , Holly DeMark Neumann  3 , Ana Miskovic  3 , David Chen  4   5 , Sherri L LaVela  1   2   6
Affiliations

Perceptions of Shared Decision Making Among Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries/Disorders

Sara M Locatelli et al. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016 Summer.

Abstract

Background: Individuals with spinal cord injuries/disorders (SCI/D) are interested in, and benefit from, shared decision making (SDM). Objective: To explore SDM among individuals with SCI/D and how demographics and health and SCI/D characteristics are related to SDM. Method: Individuals with SCI/D who were at least 1 year post injury, resided in the Chicago metropolitan area, and received SCI care at a Veterans Affairs (VA; n = 124) or an SCI Model Systems facility (n = 326) completed a mailed survey measuring demographics, health and SCI/D characteristics, physical and mental health status, and perceptions of care, including SDM, using the Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication and Treatment Decision-Making Effectiveness (COMRADE) that assesses decision-making effectiveness (effectiveness) and risk communication (communication). Bivariate analyses and multiple linear regression were used to identify variables associated with SDM. Results: Participants were mostly male (83%) and White (70%) and were an average age of 54 years (SD = 14.3). Most had traumatic etiology, 44% paraplegia, and 49% complete injury. Veteran/civilian status and demographics were unrelated to scores. Bivariate analyses showed that individuals with tetraplegia had better effectiveness scores than those with paraplegia. Better effectiveness was correlated with better physical and mental health; better communication was correlated with better mental health. Multiple linear regressions showed that tetraplegia, better physical health, and better mental health were associated with better effectiveness, and better mental health was associated with better communication. Conclusion: SCI/D and health characteristics were the only variables associated with SDM. Interventions to increase engagement in SDM and provider attention to SDM may be beneficial, especially for individuals with paraplegia or in poorer physical and mental health.

Keywords: decision making; patient-centered care; physician-patient relations; spinal cord injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adriaansen JJE, Post MWM, de Groot S et al. Secondary health conditions in persons with spinal cord injury: A longitudinal study from one to five years post-discharge. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(10):1016–1022. - PubMed
    1. Derrett S, Beaver C, Sullivan MJ, Herbison GP, Acland R, Paul C. Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord impairment in New Zealand: Incidence and characteristics of people admitted to spinal units. Inj Prev. 2012;18(5):343–346. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dudley-Javoroski S, Shields RK. Assessment of physical function and secondary complications after complete spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(2):103–110. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Teo SHJ, Sew S, Backman C et al. Health of people with spinal cord injury in Singapore: Implications for rehabilitation planning and implementation. Dis Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1460–1474. - PubMed
    1. Ullrich PM, Lincoln RK, Tackett MJ, Miskevics S, Smith BM, Weaver FM. Pain, depression, and health care utilization over time after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2013;58(2):158–165. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources