Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul;32(7):3225-3233.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6040-4. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

Changes in plasma albumin levels in early detection of infectious complications after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with ERAS protocol

Affiliations

Changes in plasma albumin levels in early detection of infectious complications after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery with ERAS protocol

Mateusz Wierdak et al. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Combination of laparoscopic approach with ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery allows for an early discharge. However there is a risk that some of the discharged patients are developing, asymptomatic at the time, infectious complications. This may lead to a delay in diagnostics and proper treatment introduction. We aimed to assess the usefulness of preoperative plasma albumin concentration and their changes as indicators of infectious complications in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods: Prospective analysis included 105 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection between August 2014 and September 2016. In all cases standardised 16-item perioperative care ERAS protocol was used (mean compliance > 85%). Patients with IBD, distant metastases, undergoing emergency or multivisceral resection were excluded. Blood samples were collected preoperatively and on POD 1, 2, 3. Plasma albumin concentration was measured. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the presence of infectious complications. We analysed the differences in the levels of albumin and the dynamics of changes.

Results: Group 1-82 not complicated patients, Group 2-23 patients with at least one infectious complication. Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in the levels of serum albumin between those groups (Group 1-38.7 ± 4.9 g/l; Group 2-37.7 ± 5.0 g/l). In postoperative period, decrease was observed in both (POD 1: Group 1-36.5 ± 4.2 g/l, Group 2-34.7 ± 4.2 g/l, p = 0.07; POD 2: Group 1-36.2 ± 4.1 g/l, Group 2-32.6 ± 5.6 g/l, p = 0.01; POD 3: Group 1-36.0 ± 4.4 g/l, Group 2-30.9 ± 3.5 g/l, p = 0.01). The decrease was significantly greater in Group 2 on POD 2 and 3.

Conclusions: We showed that a regular measurement of albumin in the early postoperative days may be beneficial in the detection of postoperative infectious complications. Although changes in albumins are observed early after surgery, this parameter is relatively unspecific.

Keywords: Albumins; Colorectal cancer; Infectious complications; Laparoscopy; Markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Mateusz Wierdak, Magdalena Pisarska, Beata Kuśnierz-Cabala, Jan Witowski, Jadwiga Dworak, Piotr Major, Piotr Małczak, Piotr Ceranowicz, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients flow through the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean albumin levels in Group 1 and Group 2 in consecutive days
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean Δ-albumin increments in Group 1 and Group 2 in consecutive days
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Albumin ratios in Group 1 and Group 2 in consecutive days
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cut-off of albumin measurements
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cut-off of Δ-albumin measurements
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cut-off of albumin ratio measurements (POD0)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the optimal cut-off of albumin ratio measurements (POD1)

References

    1. Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:83–91. doi: 10.1007/BF02237249. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ERAS Compliance Group The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg. 2015;261:1153–1159. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, Verra M, Morino M (2012) Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. 27:1485–1502. 10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x - PubMed
    1. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath F-A. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery confers lower mortality in the elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 66,483 patients. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:322–333. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3672-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M. Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg. 2013;38:1531–1541. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources