The effect of surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes among patients with cesarean scar diverticulum
- PMID: 29341106
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12444
The effect of surgery on subsequent pregnancy outcomes among patients with cesarean scar diverticulum
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether surgical treatment of cesarean scar diverticulum (CSD) reduced adverse outcomes during the subsequent pregnancy.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using the medical records of pregnant women with CSD who attended a single hospital in Hangzhou, China, between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. Baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes were compared between the surgery group and the no surgery group.
Results: There were 106 patients included in the study, 83 in the surgery group and 23 in the no surgery group. The CSD size was greater in all dimensions for the surgery group versus the no surgery group: length (P<0.001), width (P=0.001), and depth (P=0.030). The remaining myometrium was thinner among women in the surgery group than those in the no surgery group (P=0.011). In all, 76 (91.6%) women in the surgery group were symptomatic. The incidence of live delivery pregnancy was higher (P=0.033) and the incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy was lower (P=0.019) in the surgery group versus the no surgery group. Surgery increased the thickness of the lower uterine segment (P<0.001); however, it did not reduce the risks of placenta previa or placenta accreta (P=0.683) and uterine dehiscence or uterine rupture (P=0.458).
Conclusion: Surgical intervention reduced the incidence of cesarean scar pregnancy and increased the number of live deliveries.
Keywords: Cesarean scar diverticulum; Placenta accreta; Placenta previa; Pregnancy outcome; Surgery; Uterine Rupture; Uterine dehiscence.
© 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Similar articles
-
[Prediction and analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with cesarean scar diverticulum].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Aug 25;57(8):587-593. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20220107-00011. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2022. PMID: 36008285 Chinese.
-
Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.039. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27014853 Review.
-
Maternal Morbidity with Repeated Cesarean Deliveries.Am J Perinatol. 2023 Oct;40(13):1431-1436. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736183. Epub 2021 Sep 28. Am J Perinatol. 2023. PMID: 34583410
-
Perinatal assessment of complex cesarean delivery: beyond placenta accreta spectrum.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Aug;229(2):129-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.021. Epub 2023 Mar 2. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36868338
-
[Women with previous caesarean or other uterine scar: epidemiological features].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012 Dec;41(8):697-707. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022. Epub 2012 Nov 2. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012. PMID: 23123080 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy in treatment of patients with post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019 Apr;14(2):297-303. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.77775. Epub 2018 Aug 27. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2019. PMID: 31118997 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic electric resection versus vaginal surgery in the treatment of uterine scar defects after cesarean section.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jul;10(14):786. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-2916. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 35965788 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical