Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;269(3):582-588.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002667.

Editorial (Spring) Board? Gender Composition in High-impact General Surgery Journals Over 20 Years

Chelsea A Harris  1 , Tanima Banerjee  2 , Monica Cramer  3 , Shannon Manz  4 , Sarah T Ward  5 , Justin Dimick  6 , Dana A Telem  6   7
Affiliations

Editorial (Spring) Board? Gender Composition in High-impact General Surgery Journals Over 20 Years

Chelsea A Harris et al. Ann Surg. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To quantify gender composition of 10 high-impact general surgery journals, delineate how board composition has changed over time, and evaluate qualification metrics by gender.

Background: Underrepresentation of women on editorial boards may contribute to the gender-based achievement gap in surgery.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the editorial board gender composition among 10 high-impact general surgery journals in 1997, 2007, and 2017. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to assess differences in editors' H-indices, academic rank, and number of advanced degrees. Differences in editor turnover and multiple board positions were evaluated for each time interval.

Results: Over 20 years, the proportion of women on editorial boards increased from 5% to 19%. After controlling for time since board certification, no differences between men and women's number of advanced degrees, H-indices, or academic rank remained significant. Women and men were equally likely to hold multiple board positions (1997 P = 0.74; 2007 P = 0.42; 2017 P = 0.69), but men's editorial board tenure was longer across each time interval (1997-2007 P = 0.003; 2007-2017 P < 0.001; 1997-2017 P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Women surgeons have a small but growing presence on surgical editorial boards, and gender-based qualification differences are likely attributable to practice length. Men's longer tenure on editorial boards may drive some of the observed disparity by limiting new appointment opportunities. Strategies such as imposing term limits or instituting merit-based performance reviews may help editorial boards capture the field's changing demographics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Editorial board composition by percent women in 1997, 2007, and 2017 by journal (A-J) and in aggregate. Absolute number of women editors listed in parentheses.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage change in board size and gender composition 2007 to 2017.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percentage of men versus women editors who appear on multiple editorial boards both in aggregate and in the top 3 highest-impact journals in 1997, 2007, and 2017.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proportion of editors retained by gender from 1997 to 2007, 2007 to 2017, and 1997 to 2017
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jena AB, Olenski AR, Blumenthal DM. Sex Differences in Physician Salary in US Public Medical Schools. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(9):1294–1304. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, et al. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2410–2417. - PubMed
    1. Ash AS, Carr PL, Goldstein R, et al. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity? Ann. Intern. Med. 2004;141(3):205–212. - PubMed
    1. Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, et al. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: Glass ceiling or sticky floor? JAMA. 1995;273(13):1022–1025. - PubMed
    1. Kaplan SH, Sullivan LM, Dukes KA, et al. Sex differences in academic advancement. Results of a national study of pediatricians. NEJM. 1996;335(17):1282–1289. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms