Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;9(1):46-53.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615747. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record

Time Spent on Dedicated Patient Care and Documentation Tasks Before and After the Introduction of a Structured and Standardized Electronic Health Record

Erik Joukes et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Physicians spend around 35% of their time documenting patient data. They are concerned that adopting a structured and standardized electronic health record (EHR) will lead to more time documenting and less time for patient care, especially during consultations.

Objective: This study measures the effect of the introduction of a structured and standardized EHR on documentation time and time for dedicated patient care during outpatient consultations.

Methods: We measured physicians' time spent on four task categories during outpatient consultations: documentation, patient care, peer communication, and other activities. Physicians covered various specialties from two university hospitals that jointly implemented a structured and standardized EHR. Preimplementation, one hospital used a legacy-EHR, and one primarily paper-based records. The same physicians were observed 2 to 6 months before and 6 to 8 months after implementation.We analyzed consultation duration, and percentage of time spent on each task category. Differences in time distribution before and after implementation were tested using multilevel linear regression.

Results: We observed 24 physicians (162 hours, 439 consultations). We found no significant difference in consultation duration or number of consultations per hour. In the legacy-EHR center, we found the implementation associated with a significant decrease in time spent on dedicated patient care (-8.5%). In contrast, in the previously paper-based center, we found a significant increase in dedicated time spent on documentation (8.3%) and decrease in time on combined patient care and documentation (-4.6%). The effect on dedicated documentation time significantly differed between centers.

Conclusion: Implementation of a structured and standardized EHR was associated with 8.5% decrease in time for dedicated patient care during consultations in one center and 8.3% increase in dedicated documentation time in another center. These results are in line with physicians' concerns that the introduction of a structured and standardized EHR might lead to more documentation burden and less time for dedicated patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Interface of the application used by the observers (translated from Dutch). In this figure, “direct patient care” and “input” are selected to indicate the physician is talking to the patient and documenting patient data in the record at the same time.

References

    1. Toll E. A piece of my mind. The cost of technology. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2497–2498. - PubMed
    1. Rathert C, Mittler J N, Banerjee S, McDaniel J. Patient-centered communication in the era of electronic health records: what does the evidence say? Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(01):50–64. - PubMed
    1. Lee W W, Alkureishi M A, Ukabiala O et al.Patient perceptions of electronic medical record use by faculty and resident physicians: a mixed methods study. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31(11):1315–1322. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joukes E, De Keizer N, Abu-Hanna A, De Bruijne M, Cornet R.End-User experiences and expectations regarding data registration and reuse before the implementation of a (new) electronic health record: a case study in two university hospitals Stud Health Technol Inform 2015216997. Doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-564-7-997 - PubMed
    1. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation.SNOMED InternationalAvailable at:http://www.snomed.org/. Accessed May 19, 2017