Considering experimental and observational evidence of priming together, syntax doesn't look so autonomous
- PMID: 29342729
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X17000486
Considering experimental and observational evidence of priming together, syntax doesn't look so autonomous
Abstract
We agree with Branigan & Pickering (B&P) that structural priming experiments should supplant grammaticality judgments for testing linguistic representation. However, B&P overlook a vast (corpus-)linguistic literature that converges with - but extends - the experimental findings. B&P conclude that syntax is functionally independent of the lexicon. We argue that a broader approach to priming reveals cracks in the façade of syntactic autonomy.
Comment in
-
Structural priming and the representation of language.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e313. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001212. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342741
Comment on
-
An experimental approach to linguistic representation.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e282. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16002028. Epub 2016 Nov 29. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 27894378
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
