There is no compelling evidence that human neonates imitate
- PMID: 29342820
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16001898
There is no compelling evidence that human neonates imitate
Abstract
Keven & Akins (K&A) propose that neonatal "imitation" is a function of newborns' spontaneous oral stereotypies and should be viewed within the context of normal aerodigestive development. Their proposal is in line with the result of our recent large longitudinal study that found no compelling evidence for neonatal imitation. Together, these works prompt reconsideration of the developmental origin of genuine imitation.
Comment on
-
Beyond neonatal imitation: Aerodigestive stereotypies, speech development, and social interaction in the extended perinatal period.Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e403. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X17001923. Behav Brain Sci. 2017. PMID: 29342817
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
