Comparative Response of the Hepatic Transcriptomes of Domesticated and Wild Turkey to Aflatoxin B₁
- PMID: 29342849
- PMCID: PMC5793129
- DOI: 10.3390/toxins10010042
Comparative Response of the Hepatic Transcriptomes of Domesticated and Wild Turkey to Aflatoxin B₁
Abstract
The food-borne mycotoxin aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) poses a significant risk to poultry, which are highly susceptible to its hepatotoxic effects. Domesticated turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) are especially sensitive, whereas wild turkeys (M. g. silvestris) are more resistant. AFB₁ toxicity entails bioactivation by hepatic cytochrome P450s to the electrophilic exo-AFB₁-8,9-epoxide (AFBO). Domesticated turkeys lack functional hepatic GST-mediated detoxification of AFBO, and this is largely responsible for the differences in resistance between turkey types. This study was designed to characterize transcriptional changes induced in turkey livers by AFB₁, and to contrast the response of domesticated (susceptible) and wild (more resistant) birds. Gene expression responses to AFB₁ were examined using RNA-sequencing. Statistically significant differences in gene expression were observed among treatment groups and between turkey types. Expression analysis identified 4621 genes with significant differential expression (DE) in AFB₁-treated birds compared to controls. Characterization of DE transcripts revealed genes dis-regulated in response to toxic insult with significant association of Phase I and Phase II genes and others important in cellular regulation, modulation of apoptosis, and inflammatory responses. Constitutive expression of GSTA3 was significantly higher in wild birds and was significantly higher in AFB₁-treated birds when compared to controls for both genetic groups. This pattern was also observed by qRT-PCR in other wild and domesticated turkey strains. Results of this study emphasize the differential response of these genetically distinct birds, and identify genes and pathways that are differentially altered in aflatoxicosis.
Keywords: Key Contribution; RNA-seq; Results of this study support the hypothesis that the greater ability of wild turkeys to detoxify AFB1 is related to higher constitutive expression of GSTA3 coupled with an inherited (genetic) difference in functional expression in domesticated birds. Key differences in GSTA3 expression between the Eastern wild and domesticated turkeys is not unique to these genetic lines but is a broader phenomenon indicating lower fitness in domesticated birds. Results of RNA-seq analysis emphasize the differential response of these genetically distinct birds, demonstrating significant differences in expression of Phase I and Phase II genes and in genes important in toxic response.; aflatoxin B1; differential expression; domesticated turkey; liver; wild turkey.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Hepatic Transcriptome Responses of Domesticated and Wild Turkey Embryos to Aflatoxin B₁.Toxins (Basel). 2016 Jan 6;8(1):16. doi: 10.3390/toxins8010016. Toxins (Basel). 2016. PMID: 26751476 Free PMC article.
-
Differential Transcriptome Responses to Aflatoxin B₁ in the Cecal Tonsil of Susceptible and Resistant Turkeys.Toxins (Basel). 2019 Jan 18;11(1):55. doi: 10.3390/toxins11010055. Toxins (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30669283 Free PMC article.
-
Altered Gene Response to Aflatoxin B1 in the Spleens of Susceptible and Resistant Turkeys.Toxins (Basel). 2019 Apr 28;11(5):242. doi: 10.3390/toxins11050242. Toxins (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31035349 Free PMC article.
-
Aflatoxin B1 metabolism: Regulation by phase I and II metabolizing enzymes and chemoprotective agents.Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;778:79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 29. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2018. PMID: 30454686 Review.
-
Dietary modulation of the biotransformation and genotoxicity of aflatoxin B(1).Toxicology. 2012 Sep 28;299(2-3):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.05.016. Epub 2012 May 26. Toxicology. 2012. PMID: 22640941 Review.
Cited by
-
May phytophenolics alleviate aflatoxins-induced health challenges? A holistic insight on current landscape and future prospects.Front Nutr. 2022 Oct 28;9:981984. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.981984. eCollection 2022. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 36386916 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Differential Hepatic Expression of miRNA in Response to Aflatoxin B1 Challenge in Domestic and Wild Turkeys.Toxins (Basel). 2024 Oct 22;16(11):453. doi: 10.3390/toxins16110453. Toxins (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39591208 Free PMC article.
-
Insights into Aflatoxin B1 Toxicity in Cattle: An In Vitro Whole-Transcriptomic Approach.Toxins (Basel). 2020 Jun 29;12(7):429. doi: 10.3390/toxins12070429. Toxins (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32610656 Free PMC article.
-
Biomarker of Aflatoxin Ingestion: ¹H NMR-Based Plasma Metabolomics of Dairy Cows Fed Aflatoxin B₁ with or without Sequestering Agents.Toxins (Basel). 2018 Dec 18;10(12):545. doi: 10.3390/toxins10120545. Toxins (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30567330 Free PMC article.
-
Natural Selection Footprints Among African Chicken Breeds and Village Ecotypes.Front Genet. 2019 May 8;10:376. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00376. eCollection 2019. Front Genet. 2019. PMID: 31139205 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) Mycotoxins: Risks in Plant, Animal and Human Systems. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology; Ames, IA, USA: 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous