Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Mar 14;92(7):e00030-18.
doi: 10.1128/JVI.00030-18. Print 2018 Apr 1.

Advancing Our Understanding of Protective Maternal Immunity as a Guide for Development of Vaccines To Reduce Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infections

Affiliations
Review

Advancing Our Understanding of Protective Maternal Immunity as a Guide for Development of Vaccines To Reduce Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infections

Sallie R Permar et al. J Virol. .

Abstract

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the most common congenitally transmitted pathogen worldwide, impacting an estimated 1 million newborns annually. Congenital HCMV (cCMV) infection is a major global contributor to long-term neurologic deficits, including deafness, microcephaly, and neurodevelopmental delay, as well as to fetal loss and occasional infant mortality. Accordingly, design of a maternal vaccine to prevent cCMV continues to be a top public health priority. Nevertheless, we remain without a licensed vaccine. Maternal immunity provides partial protection, as the risk of vertical HCMV transmission from chronically infected mothers is reduced compared to settings in which the mother is newly infected during pregnancy. Therefore, an understanding of the maternal immune correlates of protection against cCMV is critical to informing design of an efficacious maternal vaccine. Although vaccine development is being assiduously pursued by a large number of pharmaceutical manufacturers, biotechnology organizations, and academic researchers, some pessimism has been expressed regarding the issue of whether a vaccine to protect against cCMV is possible. This pessimism is based on observations that natural immunity is not completely protective against maternal reinfection and congenital transmission. However, we assert that optimism regarding vaccine development is indeed justified, on the basis of accruing evidence of immune correlates of protection-readily achievable by vaccination-that are associated with reduced transmission of HCMV to the fetus in seronegative women. In light of the substantial burden on society conferred by cCMV infection, even a modest reduction in the occurrence of this fetal disease is an important public health goal and justifies aggressive clinical evaluation of vaccines currently in the pipeline.

Keywords: congenital infections; cytomegalovirus; vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Congenital HCMV transmission rates in CMV-seronegative and -seropositive women. (A) Primary HCMV infection occurs infrequently (rate, 1% to 3%) in HCMV-seronegative pregnant women, but rates of cCMV transmission (30% to 40%) and infant disease (25%) are known to be high following primary maternal infection (1, 97). (B) The rate of systemic maternal HCMV reactivation in chronically infected women is not known; nor is the rate of cCMV infection in the setting of maternal reactivation known. (C) HCMV reinfection rates, identified by detection of a serologic response against a new strain of HCMV, have suggested that nearly 1 of 3 CMV seropositive women become reinfected during pregnancy (24, 39), and yet the cCMV transmission rate is up to 10-fold lower than that in primary maternal infection (3.4%) (23) and the disease rates have been reported as 10% or less (24, 29, 33, 34). Thus, similar numbers of cCMV-infected and -impaired infants occur in HCMV-seronegative and -seropositive pregnant women populations (1). *, data points where more studies are needed to further advance our understanding of the partial protective nature of preexisting HCMV immunity.

Comment in

References

    1. Kenneson A, Cannon MJ. 2007. Review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Rev Med Virol 17:253–276. doi:10.1002/rmv.535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Francis SS, Wallace AD, Wendt GA, Li L, Liu F, Riley LW, Kogan S, Walsh KM, de Smith AJ, Dahl GV, Ma X, Delwart E, Metayer C, Wiemels JL. 2017. In utero cytomegalovirus infection and development of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 129:1680–1684. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-07-723148. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Joseph GP, McDermott R, Baryshnikova MA, Cobbs CS, Ulasov IV. 2017. Cytomegalovirus as an oncomodulatory agent in the progression of glioma. Cancer Lett 384:79–85. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.10.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Navarro D. 2016. Expanding role of cytomegalovirus as a human pathogen. J Med Virol 88:1103–1112. doi:10.1002/jmv.24450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stratton KR, Durch JS, Lawrence RS (ed). 2000. Vaccines for the 21st century: a tool for decisionmaking. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances