Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 18;13(1):e0191395.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191395. eCollection 2018.

A cross-sectional study to estimate prevalence of periodontal disease in a population of dogs (Canis familiaris) in commercial breeding facilities in Indiana and Illinois

Judith L Stella  1 , Amy E Bauer  2 , Candace C Croney  2
Affiliations

A cross-sectional study to estimate prevalence of periodontal disease in a population of dogs (Canis familiaris) in commercial breeding facilities in Indiana and Illinois

Judith L Stella et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The objectives of this cross-sectional study were: 1) to estimate the prevalence and characterize the severity of periodontal disease in a population of dogs housed in commercial breeding facilities; 2) to characterize PD preventive care utilized by facility owners; and 3) to assess inter-rater reliability of a visual scoring assessment tool. Adult dogs (N = 445) representing 42 breeds at 24 CB facilities in Indiana and Illinois were assessed. Periodontal disease was scored visually using the American Veterinary Dental Collage 0-IV scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed on 198 dogs and facility owners were asked to provide information about the preventive care utilized. The overall prevalence of periodontal disease (Grades I-IV) was 86.3% (95% CI: 82.9, 89.3). An ordered logistic regression analysis found age (OR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.24, 1.54; P<0.0001), facility (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.09, 1.18; P<0.0001), sex (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.12, 2.65; P = 0.013), and non-professional dental scaling (OR = 2.82; 95% CI 1.34, 5.91; P = 0.006) to be statistically significant. Inter-rater reliability analysis found agreement to be 86.2%, with a weighted kappa of 0.4731 (95% CI 0.3847, 0.5615) indicating moderate agreement. Risk of periodontal disease increased with increasing age. Additionally, a trend toward decreasing risk with increasing weight was also found, although it was not statistically significant. The trends identified agree with studies that have evaluated periodontal disease in the companion dog population and do not support the assumption that the dental health of dogs in commercial breeding facilities is worse than that of the population as a whole. Although there were few cases of severe periodontal disease and all facilities employed some type of preventive care in this sample, the large number of dogs with some degree of disease (Grades I-IV) suggests that further investigation of preventive care is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Funding was provided by commercial sources, the Pet Food Institute and World Pet Association. The funding sources did not have any involvement in the design or conduct of the study; collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; writing or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Visual assessment scale.
The tool used to score severity of PD.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Prevalence estimates.
Prevalence estimates (95% CI) by grade of PD.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Niemiec B. Periodontal Disease. Top Companion Anim Med. 2008; 23: 72–80. doi: 10.1053/j.tcam.2008.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wiggs RB, Lobprise HB. Periodontology In:Veterinary dentistry, principals and practice: Philadelphia:Lippincott Raven; 1997. pp. 186–231.
    1. O′Neill DG, Church DB, McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, and Brodbelt DC. Prevalence of disorders recorded in dogs attending primary-care veterinary practices in England. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(3): e90501 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090501 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Diez M, Picavet P, Ricci R, Dequenne M, Renard M, Bongartz A, et al. Health screening to identify opportunities to improve preventive medicine in cats and dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2015; 56: 463–469. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12365 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kyllar M, Witter K. Prevalence of dental disorders in pet dogs. Vet. Med.-Czech. 2005; 11: 496–505.

Publication types