Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study
- PMID: 29348138
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j5745
Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study
Erratum in
-
Development and validation of outcome prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: the SAHIT multinational cohort study.BMJ. 2018 Sep 26;362:k4079. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4079. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 30257825 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a set of practical prediction tools that reliably estimate the outcome of subarachnoid haemorrhage from ruptured intracranial aneurysms (SAH).
Design: Cohort study with logistic regression analysis to combine predictors and treatment modality.
Setting: Subarachnoid Haemorrhage International Trialists' (SAHIT) data repository, including randomised clinical trials, prospective observational studies, and hospital registries.
Participants: Researchers collaborated to pool datasets of prospective observational studies, hospital registries, and randomised clinical trials of SAH from multiple geographical regions to develop and validate clinical prediction models.
Main outcome measure: Predicted risk of mortality or functional outcome at three months according to score on the Glasgow outcome scale.
Results: Clinical prediction models were developed with individual patient data from 10 936 patients and validated with data from 3355 patients after development of the model. In the validation cohort, a core model including patient age, premorbid hypertension, and neurological grade on admission to predict risk of functional outcome had good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.78 to 0.82). When the core model was extended to a "neuroimaging model," with inclusion of clot volume, aneurysm size, and location, the AUC improved to 0.81 (0.79 to 0.84). A full model that extended the neuroimaging model by including treatment modality had AUC of 0.81 (0.79 to 0.83). Discrimination was lower for a similar set of models to predict risk of mortality (AUC for full model 0.76, 0.69 to 0.82). All models showed satisfactory calibration in the validation cohort.
Conclusion: The prediction models reliably estimate the outcome of patients who were managed in various settings for ruptured intracranial aneurysms that caused subarachnoid haemorrhage. The predictor items are readily derived at hospital admission. The web based SAHIT prognostic calculator (http://sahitscore.com) and the related app could be adjunctive tools to support management of patients.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; RLM receives grant support from the Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation, Brain Aneurysm Foundation, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and is chief scientific officer of Edge Therapeutics; GS is supported by the distinguished clinician scientist award from Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC); SM is a consultant to Actelion Pharmaceuticals; PLeR is a member of the scientific advisory board of Edge Therapeutics and Cerebrotech and provides regular consultation for Integra LifeSciences, Depuy-Synthes, Codman, and Neurologica; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Comment in
-
Predicting outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.BMJ. 2018 Jan 24;360:k102. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k102. BMJ. 2018. PMID: 29367205 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical