Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 23:3:136-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.011. eCollection 2017 Dec.

Who votes for public health? U.S. senator characteristics associated with voting in concordance with public health policy recommendations (1998-2013)

Jonathan Purtle  1 , Neal D Goldstein  2 , Eli Edson  1 , Annamarie Hand  1
Affiliations

Who votes for public health? U.S. senator characteristics associated with voting in concordance with public health policy recommendations (1998-2013)

Jonathan Purtle et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Abstract

Background: The voting behaviors of elected officials shape the public's health. Little is known, however, about the characteristics of elected officials who vote in concordance with public health policy recommendations. This article presents the results of study conducted with the aims of: 1) testing the hypothesis that US Democrat Senators vote in concordance with American Public Health Association (APHA) policy recommendations more frequently than US Republican Senators, 2) identifying US Senator characteristics independently associated with voting in concordance with APHA, and 3) assessing trends in APHA voting concordance by political party.

Methods: We created a legislative dataset of 1434 votes cast on 111 legislative proposals by 184 US Senators during the years 1998 through 2013. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to estimate the independent contributions of political party, gender, geographic region, and year effects to annual APHA voting concordance. Votes were nested within Senators who were nested within States to account for non-independence and models considered potential for time and spatial patterns in the data.

Results: Adjusting for covariates and accounting for serial and spatial autocorrelation, Democrats averaged 59.1 percentage points higher in annual APHA voting concordance than Republicans (95% CI: 55.5, 62.7), females averaged 7.1 percentage points higher than males (95% CI: 1.9, 12.3), and Northeastern Senators averaged 16.1 percentage points higher than Southern Senators (95% CI: 9.1, 23.1).

Conclusions: Elected official's political party affiliation, gender, and geographic region are independently associated with public health voting decisions and should be considered when targeting and tailoring science-based policy dissemination strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trend in US senators voting in concordance with APHA, by political party (1998–2013). N=1434 votes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. American Public Health Association (2016). About APHA; 〈http://apha.org/about-apha〉 - PubMed
    1. Anzia S.F., Berry C.R. The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson effect: Why do congresswomen outperform congressmen? American Journal of Political Science. 2011;55(3):478–493.
    1. Bambra C., Fox D., Scott-Samuel A. A politics of health glossary. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2007;61(7):571–574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barry C.L., Brescoll V.L., Brownell K.D., Schlesinger M. Obesity metaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Quarterly. 2009;87(1):7–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beckfield J., Krieger N. Epi+ demos+ cracy: Linking political systems and priorities to the magnitude of health inequities—evidence, gaps, and a research agenda. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2009:mxp002. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources