Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec 28:3:172-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.12.012. eCollection 2017 Dec.

Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m2 in the United States and England

Helen P Booth  1 , Judith Charlton  1 , Martin C Gulliford  1
Affiliations

Socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity with body mass index more than 40 kg/m2 in the United States and England

Helen P Booth et al. SSM Popul Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluated socioeconomic inequality in morbid obesity (body mass index, BMI ≥40 kg/m2) through an analysis of population health survey data in the United States (US) and England (UK).

Methods: We analysed data for the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Health Survey for England for 2011 to 2014. Age-adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were used to evaluate income- and education-inequality.

Results: There were 26,898 eligible UK and 10,628 US participants. Morbid obesity was more frequent in women than men, and higher in the US than the UK (men: US, 4.8%; UK, 1.7%; women US, 9.6%; UK, 3.7%). In the UK, morbid obesity showed graded income-inequality in both genders (AOR, for lowest income quintile: men, 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 2.88; women, 2.18, 1.55 to 3.07), as well as education-inequality (AOR for no school qualifications, men 2.57, 1.64 to 4.02; women, 2.18, 1.55 to 3.07). In the US, morbid obesity showed a consistent gradient only for income in women (AOR for lowest income quintile 1.97, 1.19 to 3.25). When compared with all other US groups, having college education (AOR, men, 0.56, 0.29 to 1.08; women, 0.36, 0.22 to 0.60) or household income ≥$75 000 (AOR, men 0.52, 0.27 to 0.98; women, 0.51, 0.33 to 0.80) appeared to protect against morbid obesity.

Conclusions: Morbid obesity is associated with lower socioeconomic status in men and women in the UK. In the US, morbid obesity was twice as prevalent, but less strongly associated with socioeconomic status, suggesting that morbid obesity may now have spread to all but the highest socioeconomic groups.

Keywords: (AOR), age-adjusted odds ratio; (CSE), certificate of secondary education; (HSE), Health Survey for England; (NHANES), National Health and Nutrition Survey; Education; Health surveys; Income; Morbid; NCD, Non-communicable disease; Obesity; Socioeconomic position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Age-standardised prevalence of morbid obesity by household income (upper panel) and education (lower panel) in England and the USA. Black bars, men; gray bars, women.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arterburn D., Maciejewski M., Tsevat J. Impact of morbid obesity on medical expenditures in adults. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 2005;29(3):334–339. - PubMed
    1. Bambra C. Going beyond the three worlds of welfare capitalism: regime theory and public health research. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2007;61:1098–1102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks J., Marmot M., Oldfield Z., Smith J.P. Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England. JAMA. 2006;295(17):2037–2045. - PubMed
    1. Beenackers M.A., Kamphuis C.B., Giskes K., Brug J., Kunst A.E., Burdorf A., van Lenthe F.J. Socioeconomic inequalities in occupational, leisure-time, and transport related physical activity among European adults: a systematic review. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2012;9(1):1–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benach J., Muntaner C. Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(4):276–277. - PMC - PubMed