Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;53(6):4437-4459.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12721. Epub 2018 Jan 19.

Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Affiliations

Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Jostein Grytten et al. Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effect that the introduction of new diagnostic technology in obstetric care has had on fetal death.

Data source: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway provided detailed medical information for approximately 1.2 million deliveries from 1967 to 1995. Information about diagnostic technology was collected directly from the maternity units, using a questionnaire.

Study design: The data were analyzed using a hospital fixed-effects regression with fetal mortality as the outcome measure. The key independent variables were the introduction of ultrasound and electronic fetal monitoring at each maternity ward. Hospital-specific trends and risk factors of the mother were included as control variables. The richness of the data allowed us to perform several robustness tests.

Principal finding: The introduction of ultrasound caused a significant drop in fetal mortality rate, while the introduction of electronic fetal monitoring had no effect on the rate. In the population as a whole, ultrasound contributed to a reduction in fetal deaths of nearly 20 percent. For post-term deliveries, the reduction was well over 50 percent.

Conclusion: The introduction of ultrasound made a major contribution to the decline in fetal mortality at the end of the last century.

Keywords: Obstetrics/Gynecology; econometrics; maternal and perinatal care and outcomes; technology adoption/diffusion/use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Proportion of Fetal Deaths, According to Year and Gestational Age Period, 1967–2011

References

    1. Almond, D. , Chay K. Y., and Lee D. S.. 2005. “The Costs of Low Birth Weight.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3): 1031–83.
    1. Almond, D. , Doyle J. J., Kowalski A. E., and Williams H.. 2010. “Estimating Marginal Returns to Medical Care: Evidence from At‐Risk Newborns.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (2): 591–634. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakketeig, L. S. , Jacobsen G., Brodtkorb C. J., Eriksen B. C., Eik‐Nes S. H., Ulstein M. K., Balstad P., and Jørgensen N. P.. 1984. “Randomised Controlled Trial of Ultrasonographic Screening in Pregnancy.” Lancet 324 (8396): 207–11. - PubMed
    1. Barisic, I. , Clementi M., Häusler M., Gjergja R., Kern J., Stoll C., and The Euroscan Study Group . 2001. “Evaluation of Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Fetal Abdominal Wall Defects by 19 European Registries.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 18 (4): 309–15. - PubMed
    1. Blix, E. , Øian P., and Kumle M.. 2008. “Utfall Etter Planlagte Hjemmefødsler.” Tidsskrift for Den Norske Legeforening 128 (21): 2439. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources