Paternal Perinatal Depression Assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Gotland Male Depression Scale: Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors
- PMID: 29350097
- PMCID: PMC6131440
- DOI: 10.1177/1557988317749071
Paternal Perinatal Depression Assessed by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and the Gotland Male Depression Scale: Prevalence and Possible Risk Factors
Abstract
Several studies have used the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), developed to screen new mothers, also for new fathers. This study aimed to further contribute to this knowledge by comparing assessment of possible depression in fathers and associated demographic factors by the EPDS and the Gotland Male Depression Scale (GMDS), developed for "male" depression screening. The study compared EPDS score ≥10 and ≥12, corresponding to minor and major depression, respectively, in relation to GMDS score ≥13. At 3-6 months after child birth, a questionnaire was sent to 8,011 fathers of whom 3,656 (46%) responded. The detection of possibly depressed fathers by EPDS was 8.1% at score ≥12, comparable to the 8.6% detected by the GMDS. At score ≥10, the proportion detected by EPDS increased to 13.3%. Associations with possible risk factors were analyzed for fathers detected by one or both scales. A low income was associated with depression in all groups. Fathers detected by EPDS alone were at higher risk if they had three or more children, or lower education. Fathers detected by EPDS alone at score ≥10, or by both scales at EPDS score ≥12, more often were born in a foreign country. Seemingly, the EPDS and the GMDS are associated with different demographic risk factors. The EPDS score appears critical since 5% of possibly depressed fathers are excluded at EPDS cutoff 12. These results suggest that neither scale alone is sufficient for depression screening in new fathers, and that the decision of EPDS cutoff is crucial.
Keywords: Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); Gotland Male Depression Scale (GMDS); depression; father; risk factors.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


References
-
- APA (American Psychological Association). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-V). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
-
- Björkenstam E., Dalman C., Vinnerljung B., Weitoft G. R., Walder D. J., Burström B. (2016). Childhood household dysfunction, school performance and psychiatric care utilisation in young adults: A register study of 96 399 individuals in Stockholm County. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70(5), 473–480. Retrieved from 10.1136/jech-2015-206329 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bladon T. L. (2010). The downward trend of survey response rates: Implications and considerations for evaluators. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 24(2), 131–156.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical