Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0190984.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190984. eCollection 2018.

Impact of educational interventions on adolescent attitudes and knowledge regarding vaccination: A pilot study

Affiliations

Impact of educational interventions on adolescent attitudes and knowledge regarding vaccination: A pilot study

Kate Carolan et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Current immunisation levels in England currently fall slightly below the threshold recommended by the World Health Organization, and the three-year trend for vaccination uptake is downwards. Attitudes towards vaccination can affect future decisions on whether or not to vaccinate, and this can have significant public health implications. Interventions can impact future vaccination decisions, and these interventions can take several forms. Relatively little work has been reported on the use of vaccination interventions in young people, who form the next generation of individuals likely to make vaccination decisions.

Method: We investigated the impact of two different types of educational intervention on attitudes towards vaccination in young people in England. A cohort of young people (n = 63) was recruited via a local school. This group was divided into three sub-groups; one (n = 21) received a presentation-based intervention, one (n = 26) received an interactive simulation-based intervention, and the third (n = 16) received no intervention. Participants supplied information on (1) their attitudes towards vaccination, and (2) their information needs and views on personal choice concerning vaccination, at three time points: immediately before and after the intervention, and after six months.

Results: Neither intervention had a significant effect on participants' attitudes towards vaccination. However, the group receiving the presentation-based intervention saw a sustained uplift in confidence about information needs, which was not observed in the simulation-based intervention group.

Discussion: Our findings with young people are consistent with previous work on vaccination interventions aimed at adults, which have shown limited effectiveness, and which can actually reduce intention to vaccinate. Our findings on the most effective mode of delivery for the intervention should inform future discussion in the growing "games for health" domain, which proposes the use of interactive digital resources in healthcare education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Net attitudinal shift.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plotkin SL, Plotkin SA. A short history of vaccination In: Vaccines. 5th ed Saunders Philadelphia; 2004. p. 1–16.
    1. Fine PE. Herd immunity: history, theory, practice. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1993;15(2):265–302. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036121 - DOI - PubMed
    1. WorldHealthOrganization. Health21: the health for all policy framework for the WHO European Region; 1999. - PubMed
    1. NHSDigital. NHS Immunisation Statistics, England, 2015-16; 2016.
    1. Omer SB, Salmon DA, Orenstein WA, Dehart MP, Halsey N. Vaccine refusal, mandatory immunization, and the risks of vaccine-preventable diseases. New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(19):1981–1988. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0806477 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types