A portable prototype magnetometer to differentiate ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease in patients with chest pain
- PMID: 29351337
- PMCID: PMC5774725
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191241
A portable prototype magnetometer to differentiate ischemic and non-ischemic heart disease in patients with chest pain
Abstract
Background: Magnetocardiography (MCG) is a non-invasive technique used to measure and map cardiac magnetic fields. We describe the predictive performance of a portable prototype magnetometer designed for use in acute and routine clinical settings. We assessed the predictive ability of the measurements derived from the magnetometer for the ruling-out of healthy subjects and patients whose chest pain has a non-ischemic origin from those with ischemic heart disease (IHD).
Methods: MCG data were analyzed from a technical performance study, a pilot clinical study, and a young healthy reference group. Participants were grouped to enable differentiation of those with IHD versus non-IHD versus controls: Group A (70 IHD patients); Group B (69 controls); Group C (37 young healthy volunteers). Scans were recorded in an unshielded room. Between-group differences were explored using analysis of variance. The ability of 10 candidate MCG predictors to predict normal/abnormal cases was analyzed using logistic regression. Predictive performance was internally validated using repeated five-fold cross-validation.
Results: Three MCG predictors showed a significant difference between patients and age-matched controls (P<0.001); eight predictors showed a significant difference between patients and young healthy volunteers (P<0.001). Logistic regression comparing patients with controls yielded a specificity of 35.0%, sensitivity of 95.4%, and negative predictive value for the ruling-out of IHD of 97.8% (area under the curve 0.78).
Conclusion: This analysis represents a preliminary indication that the portable magnetometer can help rule-out healthy subjects and patients whose chest pain has a non-ischemic origin from those with IHD.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Mehta SR, Granger CB, Boden WE, Steg PG, Bassand JP, Faxon DP, et al. Early versus delayed invasive intervention in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 2165–2175. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807986 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: e139–e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Rohacek M, Bertolotti A, Grützmüller N, Simmen U, Marty H, Zimmermann H, et al. The challenge of triaging chest pain patients: the bernese university hospital experience. Emerg Med Int 2012; 2012: 975614 doi: 10.1155/2012/975614 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Bosschaert MA, Mast EG, Mosterd A, et al. A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 2153–2158. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.255 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Six AJ, Backus BE, Kingma A, Kaandorp SI. Consumption of diagnostic procedures and other cardiology care in chest pain patients after presentation at the emergency department. Neth Heart J 2012; 20: 499–504. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0322-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
