Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 19;13(1):e0191263.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191263. eCollection 2018.

Labeling for Big Data in radiation oncology: The Radiation Oncology Structures ontology

Affiliations

Labeling for Big Data in radiation oncology: The Radiation Oncology Structures ontology

Jean-Emmanuel Bibault et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: Leveraging Electronic Health Records (EHR) and Oncology Information Systems (OIS) has great potential to generate hypotheses for cancer treatment, since they directly provide medical data on a large scale. In order to gather a significant amount of patients with a high level of clinical details, multicenter studies are necessary. A challenge in creating high quality Big Data studies involving several treatment centers is the lack of semantic interoperability between data sources. We present the ontology we developed to address this issue.

Methods: Radiation Oncology anatomical and target volumes were categorized in anatomical and treatment planning classes. International delineation guidelines specific to radiation oncology were used for lymph nodes areas and target volumes. Hierarchical classes were created to generate The Radiation Oncology Structures (ROS) Ontology. The ROS was then applied to the data from our institution.

Results: Four hundred and seventeen classes were created with a maximum of 14 children classes (average = 5). The ontology was then converted into a Web Ontology Language (.owl) format and made available online on Bioportal and GitHub under an Apache 2.0 License. We extracted all structures delineated in our department since the opening in 2001. 20,758 structures were exported from our "record-and-verify" system, demonstrating a significant heterogeneity within a single center. All structures were matched to the ROS ontology before integration into our clinical data warehouse (CDW).

Conclusion: In this study we describe a new ontology, specific to radiation oncology, that reports all anatomical and treatment planning structures that can be delineated. This ontology will be used to integrate dosimetric data in the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris CDW that stores data from 6.5 million patients (as of February 2017).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Map of the ROS ontology from the first superclass to the cervical lymph nodes area I class.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Visualization of heterogeneity reduction for cervical lymph nodes area I.
A: all area I labels. B: Label LN_C1_L (red). C: Label LN_C1_R (green). D: Label LN_C1 (blue).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Dose Volume Histogram for 84 patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer generated from the dosimetric data extracted from the treatment planning system and integrated into our i2b2 CDW.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen C, He M, Zhu Y, Shi L, Wang X. Five critical elements to ensure the precision medicine. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34: 313–318. doi: 10.1007/s10555-015-9555-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3: 160018 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Santanam L, Hurkmans C, Mutic S, van Vliet-Vroegindeweij C, Brame S, Straube W, et al. Standardizing Naming Conventions in Radiation Oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83: 1344–1349. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.09.054 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AAPM Committee Tree [Internet]. [cited 22 Jul 2017]. http://www.aapm.org/org/structure/?committee_code=TG263
    1. Noy NF, Musen MA, Mejino JLV, Rosse C. Pushing the envelope: challenges in a frame-based representation of human anatomy [Internet]. [cited 25 Apr 2017]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169023X03001253

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources