Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;17(1):30-38.
doi: 10.1002/wps.20482.

Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective

Amy M Kilbourne  1   2 , Kathryn Beck  2 , Brigitta Spaeth-Rublee  3 , Parashar Ramanuj  4   5 , Robert W O'Brien  1 , Naomi Tomoyasu  1 , Harold Alan Pincus  6
Affiliations

Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective

Amy M Kilbourne et al. World Psychiatry. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Mental disorders are common worldwide, yet the quality of care for these disorders has not increased to the same extent as that for physical conditions. In this paper, we present a framework for promoting quality measurement as a tool for improving quality of mental health care. We identify key barriers to this effort, including lack of standardized information technology-based data sources, limited scientific evidence for mental health quality measures, lack of provider training and support, and cultural barriers to integrating mental health care within general health environments. We describe several innovations that are underway worldwide which can mitigate these barriers. Based on these experiences, we offer several recommendations for improving quality of mental health care. Health care payers and providers will need a portfolio of validated measures of patient-centered outcomes across a spectrum of conditions. Common data elements will have to be developed and embedded within existing electronic health records and other information technology tools. Mental health outcomes will need to be assessed more routinely, and measurement-based care should become part of the overall culture of the mental health care system. Health care systems will need a valid way to stratify quality measures, in order to address potential gaps among subpopulations and identify groups in most need of quality improvement. Much more attention should be devoted to workforce training in and capacity for quality improvement. The field of mental health quality improvement is a team sport, requiring coordination across different providers, involvement of consumer advocates, and leveraging of resources and incentives from health care payers and systems.

Keywords: Mental disorders; electronic health records; health care systems; health informatics; health policy; patient-centered outcomes; quality measurement; quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multi‐stakeholder roadmap for measuring and improving quality of mental health care
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3:171‐8. - PubMed
    1. De Hert M, Correll CU, Bobes J et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry 2011;10:52‐77. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldberg D. The detection and treatment of depression in the physically ill. World Psychiatry 2010;9:16‐20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin EH, Rutter CM, Katon W et al. Depression and advanced complications of diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:264‐9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walker ER, McGee RE, Druss BG. Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2015;72:334‐41. - PMC - PubMed