Comparison of Patient Outcome Measures between a Traditional Teaching Hospitalist Service and a Non-Teaching Hospitalist Service at an Academic Children's Hospital
- PMID: 29354324
- PMCID: PMC5771429
- DOI: 10.4172/2161-0665.1000336
Comparison of Patient Outcome Measures between a Traditional Teaching Hospitalist Service and a Non-Teaching Hospitalist Service at an Academic Children's Hospital
Abstract
Background and objectives: Inpatient pediatric care is increasingly provided by pediatric hospitalists. This, in addition to changes in resident duty hour restrictions, has led to the creation of new models of care for inpatient pediatric patients. The objective of this study was to compare traditional outcome measures between a pediatric hospitalist-only service and a more traditional academic service in which care was provided by pediatric hospitalists, residents, and medical students. Attending physicians on the hospitalist-only service had an average of 1.7 years of post-residency experience compared to an average 16 years of experience for those working on the traditional academic service.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study (hospitalist-only v. teaching service) used electronic medical records data of patients (n=1,059) admitted to a quaternary care, academic, children's hospital in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania with diagnoses of bronchiolitis, viral syndrome, and gastroenteritis from July 2011 to June 2014. Primary outcome measures included length of stay, hospital costs, and readmission rates.
Results: Patients with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis admitted to the hospitalist-only service had a significantly higher severity-of-illness-score than those admitted to the teaching service. A decreased length of stay and lower hospital costs were seen for patients admitted to the hospitalist-only service; however, these differences did not reach a level of statistical significance.
Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures of patients with common pediatric illnesses admitted to a hospitalist-only versus a teaching hospitalist service. The model of a hospitalist-only service staffed by recent residency graduates may provide an efficient and effective model of care as patients admitted to this service had similar outcome measures to those patients cared for by more-experienced attending physicians.
Keywords: Bronchiolitis; Gastroenteritis; Pediatric illness.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest None.
References
-
- Barrett DJ, McGuinness GA, Cunha CA, Emans SJ, Gerson WT, et al. Pediatric hospital medicine: A proposed new subspecialty. Pediatrics. 2017;139:e20161823. - PubMed
-
- Wachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA. 2002;287:487–494. - PubMed
-
- Landrigan CP, Conway PH, Edwards S, Srivastava R. Pediatric hospitalists: A systematic review of the literature. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1736–1744. - PubMed
-
- Srivastava R, Landrigan CP, Ross-Degnan D, Soumerai SB, Homer CJ, et al. Impact of a hospitalist system on length of stay and cost for children with common conditions. Pediatrics. 2007;120:267–274. - PubMed
-
- Mussman GM, Conway PH. Pediatric hospitalist systems versus traditional models of care: effect on quality and cost outcomes. J Hosp Med. 2012;7:350–357. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources