Low risk of intra-abdominal infections in rectal cancer patients treated with Hartmann's procedure: a report from a national registry
- PMID: 29354849
- PMCID: PMC5816765
- DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-2967-0
Low risk of intra-abdominal infections in rectal cancer patients treated with Hartmann's procedure: a report from a national registry
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the postoperative surgical complications in patients with rectal cancer undergoing Hartmann's procedure (HP).
Methods: Data were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry for all patients with rectal cancer undergoing HP in 2007-2014. A retrospective analysis was performed using prospectively recorded data. Characteristics of patients and risk factors for intra-abdominal infection and re-laparotomy were analysed.
Results: Of 10,940 patients resected for rectal cancer, 1452 (13%) underwent HP (median age, 77 years). The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 3-4 in 43% of patients; 15% had distant metastases and 62% underwent a low HP. The intra-abdominal infection rate was 8% and re-laparotomy rate was 10%. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified preoperative radiotherapy (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.14-2.77), intra-operative bowel perforation (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.08-3.67), T4 tumours (OR, 1.68; 95% CI 1.04-2.69) and female gender (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.15-2.61) as risk factors for intra-abdominal infection. ASA score 3-4 (OR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.12-2.34), elevated BMI (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09) and female gender (OR, 2.06; CI, 1.41-3.00) were risk factors for re-laparotomy after HP. The rate of intra-abdominal infection was not increased after a low HP.
Conclusions: Despite older age and co-morbidities including more advanced cancer, patients undergoing Hartmann's procedure had low rates of serious postoperative complications and re-laparotomy. A low HP was not associated with a higher rate of intra-abdominal infection. HP seems to be appropriate for old and frail patients with rectal cancer.
Keywords: Hartmann’s procedure; Intra-abdominal infections; Postoperative complications; Rectal cancer; Surgery.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by The Regional Ethics Review Board in Uppsala (No. 2012/558) and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained at the time of inclusion in the registry from all individual participants in the study.
References
-
- Nikberg M, Kindler C, Chabok A, Letocha H, Shetye J, Smedh K (2015) Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic marker in the modern multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 58(3):275–282. 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000250 - PubMed
-
- van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Wouters MW, Henneman D, Marijnen CA, Rutten HR, Tollenaar RA, Tanis PJ, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Cancer Audit Group. Evaluating national practice of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer based on clinical auditing. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(9):1000–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.010. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Van Leersum NJ, Snijders HS, Henneman D, Kolfschoten NE, Gooiker GA, ten Berge MG, Eddes EH, Wouters MW, Tollenaar RA, Dutch Surgical Colorectal Cancer Audit Group. Bemelman WA, van Dam RM, Elferink MA, Karsten TM, van Krieken JH, Lemmens VE, Rutten HJ, Manusama ER, van de Velde CJ, Meijerink WJ, Wiggers T, van der Harst E, Dekker JW, Boerma D. The Dutch surgical colorectal audit. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(10):1063–1070. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dixon AR, Holmes JT. Hartmann’s procedure for carcinoma of rectum and distal sigmoid colon: 5-year audit. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990;35(3):166–168. - PubMed
-
- ReMine SG, Dozois RR. Hartmann’s procedure. Its use with complicated carcinomas of sigmoid colon and rectum. Arch Surg (Chicago, IL: 1960) 1981;116:630–633. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
