Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;18(6):1041-1052.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

Does the application site of spinal manipulative therapy alter spinal tissues loading?

Affiliations

Does the application site of spinal manipulative therapy alter spinal tissues loading?

Martha Funabashi et al. Spine J. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Background context: Previous studies found that the intervertebral disc (IVD) experiences the greatest loads during spinal manipulation therapy (SMT).

Purpose: Based on that, this study aimed to determine if loads experienced by spinal tissues are significantly altered when the application site of SMT is changed.

Study design: A biomechanical robotic serial dissection study.

Sample: Thirteen porcine cadaveric motion segments.

Outcome measures: Forces experienced by lumbar spinal tissues.

Methods: A servo-controlled linear actuator provided standardized 300 N SMT simulations to six different cutaneous locations of the porcine lumbar spine: L2-L3 and L3-L4 facet joints (FJ), L3 and L4 transverse processes (TVP), and the space between the FJs and the TVPs (BTW). Vertebral kinematics were tracked optically using indwelling bone pins; the motion segment was removed and mounted in a parallel robot equipped with a six-axis load cell. Movements of each SMT application at each site were replayed by the robot with the intact specimen and following the sequential removal of spinal ligaments, FJs and IVD. Forces induced by SMT were recorded, and specific axes were analyzed using linear mixed models.

Results: Analyses yielded a significant difference (p<.05) in spinal structures loads as a function of the application site. Spinal manipulative therapy application at the L3 vertebra caused vertebral movements and forces between L3 and L4 spinal segment in the opposite direction to when SMT was applied at L4 vertebra. Additionally, SMT applications over the soft tissue between adjacent vertebrae significantly decreased spinal structure loads.

Conclusion: Applying SMT with a constant force at different spinal levels creates different relative kinetics of the spinal segments and load spinal tissues in significantly different magnitudes.

Keywords: biomechanics; forces; lumbar vertebrae; porcine; robotics; spinal manipulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources