Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 22;7(1):13.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0681-1.

What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review

Affiliations

What are the barriers and facilitators for third sector organisations (non-profits) to evaluate their services? A systematic review

Anders Malthe Bach-Mortensen et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The third sector is becoming a more common provider of social and health services, but little is known about how third sector organisations (TSOs) evaluate their activities. Past research has reported that the third sector is under increasing pressure to evaluate its impact and performance by government and other commissioning bodies. However, in responding to this increased pressure to undertake evaluation, research suggests that many TSOs struggle to evaluate their activities following the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP). Yet, there has been no systematic effort to investigate why the third sector is struggling to provide good quality evidence of its effects.

Methods: This systematic review is reported following the PRISMA guidelines. Ten interdisciplinary databases were searched using a search string developed following best practice and in consultation with an information systems expert. Included studies were primary research of any research design investigating barriers to and facilitators of the evaluation process of TSOs as identified by practitioners. All studies were quality appraised, and the results were synthesised as a thematic summary.

Results: Twenty-four studies were included, which mainly investigated TSOs working within health and social services. The thematic summary identified the main barriers for TSOs to undertake evaluation to be related to the (1) lack of financial resources, (2) lack of technical capability and evaluation literacy and (3) challenges around identifying relevant evaluation systems and outcome indicators. Key facilitating factors involved (1) getting the appropriate support, (2) having an organisational culture that supports evaluation and (3) the motivation to be accountable to stakeholders. These findings were robust to study quality.

Conclusions: This review constitutes the first systematic effort to synthesise existing literature on factors supporting and preventing evaluation by TSOs. The prevalence of factors revolving around the lack of support, resources and clarity on appropriate outcome indicators suggests that many of the identified challenges may be met by applying evidence-based and stakeholder-inclusive strategies to develop shared evaluation requirements. Future efforts should address the application of EBP as part of the commissioning process of TSOs.

Keywords: Barriers and facilitators; EBP; Evaluation capacity; Evaluation practice; Evidence-based practice; NGO; Non-profit; TSO; Third sector; Third sector organisations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Samples of TSOs in included studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Type of service delivery of the organisations included in the studies

References

    1. Barman E. What is the bottom line for nonprofit organizations? A history of measurement in the british voluntary sector. Voluntas. 2007;18:101–115. doi: 10.1007/s11266-007-9039-3. - DOI
    1. Carman JG. Evaluation practice among community-based organizations: research into the reality. Am J Eval. 2007;28:60–75. doi: 10.1177/1098214006296245. - DOI
    1. Bovaird T, Dickinson H, Allen K. Commissioning across government: review of evidence. TSRC Research Report 86. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2012.
    1. Harlock J. Impact measurement practice in the UK third sector: a review of emerging evidence. TSRC Working Paper 106. Birmingham: University of Birmingham; 2013.
    1. Harlock J, Metcalf L. Measuring impact: prospects and challenges for third sector organisations. Volunt Sect Rev. 2016;7:101–108. doi: 10.1332/204080516X14534734765005. - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources