Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jan 22;190(3):E66-E71.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170132.

Effect of provincial spending on social services and health care on health outcomes in Canada: an observational longitudinal study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Effect of provincial spending on social services and health care on health outcomes in Canada: an observational longitudinal study

Daniel J Dutton et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Escalating health care spending is a concern in Western countries, given the lack of evidence of a direct connection between spending and improvements in health. We aimed to determine the association between spending on health care and social programs and health outcomes in Canada.

Methods: We used retrospective data from Canadian provincial expenditure reports, for the period 1981 to 2011, to model the effects of social and health spending (as a ratio, social/health) on potentially avoidable mortality, infant mortality and life expectancy. We used linear regressions, accounting for provincial fixed effects and time, and controlling for confounding variables at the provincial level.

Results: A 1-cent increase in social spending per dollar spent on health was associated with a 0.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04% to 0.16%) decrease in potentially avoidable mortality and a 0.01% (95% CI 0.01% to 0.02%) increase in life expectancy. The ratio had a statistically nonsignificant relationship with infant mortality (p = 0.2).

Interpretation: Population-level health outcomes could benefit from a reallocation of government dollars from health to social spending, even if total government spending were left unchanged. This result is consistent with other findings from Canada and the United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Real spending per capita (thousands of dollars), by province (outliers noted). Light green lines = individual provinces, dark green line = national average. Note: NB = New Brunswick, NL = Newfoundland and Labrador.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Trends over time, at national and provincial levels, of 3 population health variables: potentially avoidable mortality, infant mortality and life expectancy at birth. One outlier is noted. Light green lines = individual provinces, dark green line = national average. Note: NL = Newfoundland and Labrador.

Comment in

References

    1. Marchildon GP, Di Matteo L, editors. Bending the cost curve in health care: Canada’s provinces in international perspective. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2014.
    1. Fiscal sustainability of health systems. Paris (France): OECD Publishing; 2015.
    1. Bradley EH, Elkins BR, Herrin J, et al. Health and social services expenditures: associations with health outcomes. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:826–31. - PubMed
    1. Bradley EH, Taylor LA. The American health care paradox: why spending more is getting us less. New York: Public Affairs; 2013.
    1. Rubin J, Taylor J, Krapels J, et al. Are better health outcomes related to social expenditure? A cross-national empirical analysis of social expenditure and population health measures. Cambridge (UK): RAND Europe; 2016.

Publication types

MeSH terms