Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- PMID: 29358219
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104550
Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
Abstract
The predominant view is that a study using health data is observational research and should require individual consent unless it can be shown that gaining consent is impractical. But recent arguments have been made that citizens have an ethical obligation to share their health information for research purposes. In our view, this obligation is sufficient ground to expand the circumstances where secondary use research with identifiable health information is permitted without explicit subject consent. As such, for some studies the Institutional Review Board/Research Ethics Committee review process should not assess the practicality of gaining consent for data use. Instead the review process should focus on assessing the public good of the research, public engagement and transparency.
Keywords: distributive justice; informed consent; research ethics.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Comment in
-
In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer's 'Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research'.J Med Ethics. 2019 May;45(5):351-352. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105271. Epub 2019 Jan 7. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30617201 Free PMC article.
-
Taxonomy of justifications for consent waivers: When and why are public views relevant?J Med Ethics. 2019 May;45(5):353-354. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105318. Epub 2019 Mar 12. J Med Ethics. 2019. PMID: 30862708 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials