Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan 23;15(2):181.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020181.

Faecal Pathogen Flows and Their Public Health Risks in Urban Environments: A Proposed Approach to Inform Sanitation Planning

Affiliations

Faecal Pathogen Flows and Their Public Health Risks in Urban Environments: A Proposed Approach to Inform Sanitation Planning

Freya Mills et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Public health benefits are often a key political driver of urban sanitation investment in developing countries, however, pathogen flows are rarely taken systematically into account in sanitation investment choices. While several tools and approaches on sanitation and health risks have recently been developed, this research identified gaps in their ability to predict faecal pathogen flows, to relate exposure risks to the existing sanitation services, and to compare expected impacts of improvements. This paper outlines a conceptual approach that links faecal waste discharge patterns with potential pathogen exposure pathways to quantitatively compare urban sanitation improvement options. An illustrative application of the approach is presented, using a spreadsheet-based model to compare the relative effect on disability-adjusted life years of six sanitation improvement options for a hypothetical urban situation. The approach includes consideration of the persistence or removal of different pathogen classes in different environments; recognition of multiple interconnected sludge and effluent pathways, and of multiple potential sites for exposure; and use of quantitative microbial risk assessment to support prediction of relative health risks for each option. This research provides a step forward in applying current knowledge to better consider public health, alongside environmental and other objectives, in urban sanitation decision making. Further empirical research in specific locations is now required to refine the approach and address data gaps.

Keywords: decision making; faecal waste; options assessment; pathogens; public health; risk assessment; urban sanitation; wastewater.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual approach to compare health risks of urban sanitation improvement options.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example system diagram of flow divisions and related exposure points.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Steps of the spreadsheet-based model developed to apply the conceptual framework.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Illustrative outputs from the base case highlighting the importance of considering pathogens classes separately and calculating health risk in DALY to reveal priority points of exposure pathways.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Illustrative output from the base case highlighting the significant pathways and relative contribution to health risk of different pathogens in each pathway.

References

    1. Tilley E., Lüthi C., Morel A., Zurbrügg C., Schertenleib R. Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag); Dubendorf, Switzerland: 2008.
    1. Satterthwaite D. Editorial: Why is urban health so poor even in many successful cities? Environ. Urban. 2011;23:5–11. doi: 10.1177/0956247811401521. - DOI
    1. Mitchell C., Abeysuriya K., Ross K. Making pathogen hazards visible: A new heuristic to improve sanitation investment efficacy. Waterlines. 2016;35:163–181. doi: 10.3362/1756-3488.2016.014. - DOI
    1. Freeman M., Garn J.V., Sclar G.D., Boisson S., Medlicott K., Alexander K.T., Penakalapati G., Anderson D., Mahtani A.G., Grimes J.E.T., et al. The impact of sanitation on infectious disease and nutritional status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2017;220:928–949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.05.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Labite H., Lunani I., van der Steen P., Vairavamoorthy K., Drechsel P., Lens P. Quantitative microbial risk analysis to evaluate health effects of interventions in the urban water system of Accra, Ghana. J. Water Health. 2010;8:417–430. doi: 10.2166/wh.2010.021. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources