Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 May 1;57(suppl_4):iv99-iv107.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex522.

What is new in pain modification in osteoarthritis?

Affiliations
Review

What is new in pain modification in osteoarthritis?

Rachel E Miller et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

There is a big need for the development of novel therapies for the safe management of chronic pain associated with OA. Here we reviewed PubMed (2015 onward) and ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing and recently completed trials where pain in OA is the primary outcome measure. Three broad categories were identified: biological therapies, small molecules and cryoneurolysis. The most promising new strategy is blockade of nerve growth factor with antibodies. Two anti-nerve growth factor antibodies, tanuzemab and fasinumab, are in active development after the 2010 hold on trials was lifted in 2015. In addition, several active clinical trials are testing distinct mechanism-based interventions, including cytokine inhibition, selective μ, δ or κ opioid receptor agonists, zoledronate and intra-articular capsaicin. In addition to pharmacological approaches, cryoneurolytic strategies that directly target peripheral nerves may play a role in OA pain management, but efficacy profiles and long-term effects of such treatments need more study. Clearly, the therapeutic landscape for OA pain is rapidly expanding. Since symptomatic OA is a heterogeneous disease, the challenge will be to identify patients that will benefit the most from specific approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG. et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:26–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Global Burden of Disease Study C. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015;386:743–800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buckwalter JA, Saltzman C, Brown T.. The impact of osteoarthritis: implications for research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;(427 Suppl):S6–15. - PubMed
    1. Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Campion ME, O’Fallon WM.. Direct medical costs unique to people with arthritis. J Rheumatol 1997;24:719–25. - PubMed
    1. Murphy L, Helmick CG.. The impact of osteoarthritis in the United States: a population-health perspective. Am J Nurs 2012;112:S13–9. - PubMed

Publication types