Breaking bad news to antenatal patients with strategies to lessen the pain: a qualitative study
- PMID: 29361953
- PMCID: PMC5781305
- DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0454-2
Breaking bad news to antenatal patients with strategies to lessen the pain: a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: To consider the thoughts and actions of healthcare personnel in situations when an adverse prenatal diagnosis must be communicated, including appropriate strategies and skills to respond to information needs and to manage the emotional responses of patients.
Methods: Descriptive qualitative study using non-participant observation and semi-structured interviews to analyse the discourses of physicians, midwives, nurses and nursing assistants who provide healthcare to obstetric patients.
Results: There may be barriers to effective communication between healthcare personnel and patients, depending on the characteristics of the persons involved, the organisation of healthcare, biotechnological progress and cultural factors.
Conclusions: The human quality of healthcare has deteriorated due to excessive workloads and to the growing role played by technology. In order to improve communication, more attention should be paid to human and spiritual dimensions, prioritising empathy, authenticity and non-judgmental listening. An appropriate model of clinical relationship should be based on shared decision making, clarifying the functions of the multidisciplinary team to alleviate a mother’s suffering when a pregnancy is interrupted. To do so, protocols should be implemented to ensure the provision of comprehensive care, not only addressing biological issues but also providing psychosocial attention. Finally, training should be provided to healthcare staff to enhance their social skills and cultural competence.
This study identifies potential improvements in the interventions made by healthcare personnel and in the organisation of the institution, concerning the attention provided to pregnant women when an adverse prenatal diagnosis must be communicated.
Keywords: Communicative skills; Congenital anomalies; Interpersonal relations; Pregnancy; Prenatal diagnosis; Qualitative research.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Local Research Ethics Committee Costa del Sol (Spain) CEI (003_mayo_PR2-Malas Noticias) on 01 June 2015, and was carried out in accordance with the ethical principles as set out in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written consent was obtained from all the participants in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable in this section.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
-
- M. Rodriguez de Alba, A. Bustamante-Aragones, S. Perlado, M. J. Trujillo-Tiebas, J. Diaz-Recasens, J. Plaza-Arranz, y C. Ramos, Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of monogenic disorders. Expert Opin Biol Ther, vol. 12 Suppl 1, pp. S171-S179, jun. 2012. - PubMed
-
- L. Butalid, J. M. Bensing, y P. F. M. Verhaak, «Talking about psychosocial problems: an observational study on changes in doctor-patient communication in general practice between 1977 and 2008.», Patient Educ Couns, vol. 94, n.o 3, pp. 314-321, mar. 2014. - PubMed
-
- F. A. Derksen, T. C. Olde Hartman, J. M. Bensing, y A. L. Lagro-Janssen, «Managing barriers to empathy in the clinical encounter: a qualitative interview study with GPs.», The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, vol. 66, n.o 653, pp. e887-e895, dic. 2016. - PMC - PubMed
-
- R. L. J. Street, G. Makoul, N. K. Arora, y R. M. Epstein, «How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes.», Patient Educ Couns, vol. 74, n.o 3, pp. 295-301, mar. 2009. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials