Editorial Evaluation, Peer Review, and Publication of Research Reports With and Without Supplementary Online Content
- PMID: 29362785
- PMCID: PMC5833562
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.20650
Editorial Evaluation, Peer Review, and Publication of Research Reports With and Without Supplementary Online Content
Abstract
This study assesses whether research manuscripts with supplemental material submitted in 2016 to JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, and JAMA Pediatrics were more likely than those without supplements to undergo peer review, be accepted, and have more online views and downloads.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
References
-
- Schriger DL, Chehrazi AC, Merchant RM, Altman DG. Use of the internet by print medical journals in 2003 to 2009: a longitudinal observational study. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(2):153-160.e3. - PubMed
-
- Marcus E. Taming supplemental material. Cell. 2009;139(1):11. - PubMed
-
- National Information Standards Organization; National Federation of Advanced Information Services Recommended practices for online supplemental journal article materials, January 2013. http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/10055/RP-15-2013_Supp.... Accessed September 19, 2017.
-
- Maunsell J. Announcement regarding supplemental material. J Neurosci. 2010;30(32):10599-10600.
-
- Borowski C. Enough is enough. J Exp Med. 2011;208(7):1337.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
