Differential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure
- PMID: 29363478
- DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2017.183
Differential Item Functioning: Beyond validity evidence based on internal structure
Abstract
Background: In the latest release of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Differential Item Functioning (DIF) is considered as validity evidence based on internal structure. However, there are no indications of how to design a DIF study as a validation study. In this paper, we propose relating DIF to all sources of validity evidence, and provide a general conceptual framework for transforming “typical” DIF studies into validation studies.
Method: We perform a comprehensive review of the literature and make theoretical and practical proposals.
Results: The article provides arguments in favour of addressing DIF detection and interpretation as validation studies, and suggestions for conducting DIF validation studies.
Discussion: The combination of quantitative and qualitative data within a mixed methods research perspective, along with planning DIF studies as validation studies, can help improve the validity of test score interpretations.
Similar articles
-
Exploring the Utility of Logistic Mixed Modeling Approaches to Simultaneously Investigate Item and Testlet DIF on Testlet-based Data.J Appl Meas. 2016;17(1):79-90. J Appl Meas. 2016. PMID: 26784379
-
Evaluating construct validity of the second version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire through analysis of differential item functioning and differential item effect.Scand J Public Health. 2010 Feb;38(3 Suppl):90-105. doi: 10.1177/1403494809352533. Scand J Public Health. 2010. PMID: 21172775
-
Validating assessments: Introduction to the Special Section.Psicothema. 2014;26(1):97-9. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.255. Psicothema. 2014. PMID: 24444736
-
Validity evidence based on response processes.Psicothema. 2014;26(1):136-44. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.259. Psicothema. 2014. PMID: 24444741 Review.
-
Differential item functioning (DIF) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Overview, sample, and issues of translation.Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11 Suppl 3):S95-S106. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245181.96133.db. Med Care. 2006. PMID: 17060840 Review.
Cited by
-
Examining the Instructional Sensitivity of Constructed-Response Achievement Test Item Scores.Educ Psychol Meas. 2025 Jan 30:00131644241313212. doi: 10.1177/00131644241313212. Online ahead of print. Educ Psychol Meas. 2025. PMID: 39896146 Free PMC article.
-
Network and Exploratory Factorial Analysis of the Depression Clinical Evaluation Test.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710788. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36078505 Free PMC article.
-
Psychometric Properties of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) in a Sample of Active Health Care Professionals in Spain.Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Nov 30;15:3461-3472. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S387242. eCollection 2022. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022. PMID: 36474956 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity of the Basic Depression Questionnaire.Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;19(3):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Aug 12. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2019. PMID: 33767735 Free PMC article.
-
Rasch-Validated Italian Scale for Diagnosing Digital Eye Strain: The Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire IT©.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 8;19(8):4506. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084506. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35457379 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources